2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear data sensitivity, uncertainty and target accuracy assessment for future nuclear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The two measurements are in good agreement with each other for [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] MeV and the averaged cross section agrees well with previous, direct, measurements in the 5-10 MeV range; it is somewhat higher (by less than 20%) than those at about 15 MeV. The ratio measurement does not, and is not expected to, produce highly-accurate fission results at low energies (< 5 MeV here), due to the underlying Weisskopf-Ewing assumption.…”
Section: Neutron-induced Fission Reactionssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two measurements are in good agreement with each other for [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] MeV and the averaged cross section agrees well with previous, direct, measurements in the 5-10 MeV range; it is somewhat higher (by less than 20%) than those at about 15 MeV. The ratio measurement does not, and is not expected to, produce highly-accurate fission results at low energies (< 5 MeV here), due to the underlying Weisskopf-Ewing assumption.…”
Section: Neutron-induced Fission Reactionssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…First, the level of precision required for the cross section is often higher than in the fission case: Recent advances in modeling the astrophysical s process have resulted in requests to determine capture cross sections within a few percent and nuclear-energy applications require cross sections to within 5-10% [18,19]. Achieving an accuracy of a few percent is challenging, but constraining an unknown (n,γ) cross section to within 20-30% should be considered a meaningful improvement of the situation, in particular since current cross section evaluations often show large deviations from each other.…”
Section: Capture Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent interest in new Generation-IV nuclear reactor designs, many of which utilize fast neutrons [1], has increased the need for accurate data for neutron-induced reactions. Cross-section data, even of minor actinides, may alter reactor neutronics and burnup and are needed to engineer safer and more proliferation-resistant reactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two Na-cooled FRs with different core sizes and MA ÓAtomic Energy Society of Japan contents have been analyzed, 5) namely, SFR, i.e., a burner fast reactor, with a MA/Pu ratio that is approximately equal to $0:1 and a CR $ 0:20, and a standard large fast reactor (EFR) with a limited content of MA in the fuel, equivalent to the equilibrium value. A summary of the two core characteristics is given below and the respective TRU compositions are given in Table 1 Na void reactivity, Doppler coefficients, and effective delayed neutron fraction have been calculated with the ERANOS code system.…”
Section: Systems Considered and Reference Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%