2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2020.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A=190

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 345 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is highly likely that this peak is the previously measured E = 119.12 ±0.05 keV, J π = (3) − state. As can be seen in figure 4, the spin/parity configuration that best fit the data is J π = 3 − , in agreement with the current literature assignment for this level [7], with the J π = 4 − assignment also showing good agreement. While this is a promising result, such agreement is not currently observed for the vector analysing power of any of the peaks suggesting an error in the extraction of measured quantities or in the calculation input.…”
Section: Level Spins and Paritiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is highly likely that this peak is the previously measured E = 119.12 ±0.05 keV, J π = (3) − state. As can be seen in figure 4, the spin/parity configuration that best fit the data is J π = 3 − , in agreement with the current literature assignment for this level [7], with the J π = 4 − assignment also showing good agreement. While this is a promising result, such agreement is not currently observed for the vector analysing power of any of the peaks suggesting an error in the extraction of measured quantities or in the calculation input.…”
Section: Level Spins and Paritiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This will be improved upon before full publication of the energies. Previously observed states [7] have been labelled (due to the large uncertainty in the 204 ± 10 keV state, further work is needed to unambiguously assign a peak to this state).…”
Section: Level Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from this experimental and theoretical information, discussed above, we found more appropriate to consider for the description of the lowest collective states of 42 Ca [66] and 44 Ca [67], the collective model proposed in [27] and adapted in [31,32] to describe shape coexistence and mixing between an approximately spherical shape and a γ-unstable triaxial one. The model is applied here in the following way.…”
Section: Numerical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present study of lowest collective states of the 42,44 Ca isotopes [66,67] are involved, in a complementary way, the Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian [26] numerically solved for a sextic oscillator potential [27,30] and the Covariant Density Functional Theory (CDFT) [34][35][36] with the Density-Dependent Meson Exchange Model (DD-ME2) interaction [34,35]. The two models are discussed in the next two subsections.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation