2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2004.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 175

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the agreement of the present result with Hermanne et al [7] is strange if we consider the gammaray intensities tabulated in their article (I c = 3.05% for the 283 keV gamma line and 6.5% for 396 keV gamma line, i.e., the 1993 evaluation [58]). After private communication with Hermanne, we confirmed that they adopted the 2004 evaluation [47] in their data reduction, and we can conclude that the agreement with the present result is reasonable.…”
Section: Production Cross-sections Of 175g+m Ybsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the agreement of the present result with Hermanne et al [7] is strange if we consider the gammaray intensities tabulated in their article (I c = 3.05% for the 283 keV gamma line and 6.5% for 396 keV gamma line, i.e., the 1993 evaluation [58]). After private communication with Hermanne, we confirmed that they adopted the 2004 evaluation [47] in their data reduction, and we can conclude that the agreement with the present result is reasonable.…”
Section: Production Cross-sections Of 175g+m Ybsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the derivation of cross-sections, Manenti et al [8] adopted the old evaluated intensity of 175 Yb by Macchiavelli et al [58]; consequently their reported cross-sections [8] show large discrepancies to the present results. However, this discrepancy can be removed if the data are updated by using the latest evaluated intensities of 175 Yb by Basunia [47]. On the other hand, the agreement of the present result with Hermanne et al [7] is strange if we consider the gammaray intensities tabulated in their article (I c = 3.05% for the 283 keV gamma line and 6.5% for 396 keV gamma line, i.e., the 1993 evaluation [58]).…”
Section: Production Cross-sections Of 175g+m Ybcontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar result is obtained for the γ decay rate of a mixed multipole transition. The nuclear data for the magnetic transitions were taken from [43,44,45,46,47,48,49].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated states also feed into a K = 7/2 level with no other obvious decay branches, suggesting low-K assignments for the 1434-and 2124-keV levels. These states are presumed therefore to be populated by feeding from the β decay of the (9/2 + ) ground state of 175 Er [22] 5.2(2)-keV transition to the 15/2 − member is inferred from the observation of weak 159-and 295-keV γ rays in delayed coincidence with transitions above the 15/2 − isomer (see Fig. 1(a)).…”
Section: Levels At 1175 1434 and 2124 Kevmentioning
confidence: 99%