2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2008.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 151

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 467 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This time condition greatly suppresses the longer lived alpha decay lines and shows a proton decay peak at 1285(4) keV. This mean energy is slightly lower but consistent with the current literature value of 1310(10) keV [18]. In this work, the energy calibration was performed with a quadratic least-squares fit to the 151 Lu ground-state proton decay and the known 151 Dy, 150 Dy, 151 Ho, 151m Ho, and 152 Er α decay lines shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This time condition greatly suppresses the longer lived alpha decay lines and shows a proton decay peak at 1285(4) keV. This mean energy is slightly lower but consistent with the current literature value of 1310(10) keV [18]. In this work, the energy calibration was performed with a quadratic least-squares fit to the 151 Lu ground-state proton decay and the known 151 Dy, 150 Dy, 151 Ho, 151m Ho, and 152 Er α decay lines shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[5]. Although the spectrum is dominated above 3.5 MeV by α-decay lines, a peak is visible at 1232(4) keV which is consistent with the ground-state proton decay energy of 151 Lu, 1233(3) keV [18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Several γ transitions in 151 Pr [4,15,17,19] were previously reported. The 96.8 keV transition was assigned to 151 Pr from the x-γ coincidences from the fission fragments of 252 Cf and from the β − decay of 151 Ce [16,19]. Based on this 96.8 keV transition (the 96.0 keV transition in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Figure 12 shows the spectroscopic factors obtained with the three transfer operators, normalized according to the McFarlane sum rules, along with the experimental values from two different reactions [16][17][18][19]. The calculated values with the three approximations used for the transfer operator are very similar.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Calculated spectroscopic factors have been normalized to reproduce the spectroscopic sum rules. Figure 13 shows the results of the calculations along with the experimental data [16][17][18][19]25]. In contrast to the stripping reactions, there is more experimental data available for the pickup ones, which allows a more detailed comparison with the calculated values.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%