Nuclear data sheets update for A = 94

Proton-Neutron Mixed-Symmetry3ms+State inM94<

“…Because of fast g transitions to states with spin and parity J p 2 1 , 4 1 , the level at 2965.4 keV must have spin and parity quantum numbers 2 1 , 3 1 , 4 1 , or 3 2 , if we consider only M1, E2, or E1 multipolarities. J p 3 1 is favored by the measurement of the logft 7.28͑16͒ value [19,20] in the b decay of the ͑2͒ 1 low-spin isomer 94 Tc m ruling out J p 4 1 . The measured l 0 transfer [21] to the level at 2.966 MeV in the 95 Mo͑d, t͒ 94 Mo neutron pickup reaction leaves the spin and parity assignments J p 2 1 , 3 1 as the only possibilities, while J p 3 1 is favored [21].…”

C4898d50: The Two-Proton-Hole Spectrum inGórska1, Lipoglavšek2, Grawe3 et al. 1997Phys. Rev. Lett.

“…6 1 ͒ and the extracted proton effective charge, as discussed below. Therefore an alternative 5 2 assignment, a state which is observed at this energy in the N 50 isotones [19,20] and predicted in shell-model calculations (Fig. 3), or the existence of a core excited isomer as known in 96 Pd [19] were studied, assuming the following scenarios.…”

Realistic shell-model calculations for nuclei in the region of shell closures off stability

“…It should be noted that the predicted position of the 5 − state (2.73 MeV) is quite consistent with the experimental information available for the two lighter even isotones. In fact, in 96 Pd and 94 Ru a 5 − state has been observed [17,18] at 2.648 and 2.625 MeV, respectively. As regards the structure of the excited states, we find that the positive-parity states are of practically pure (πg 9/2 ) −2 character while the 5 − state is dominated by the πg −1 9/2 p −1 1/2 configuration.…”