2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.100.024307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear dipole response in the finite-temperature relativistic time-blocking approximation

Abstract: Background:The radiative neutron capture reaction rates of the r-process nucleosynthesis are immensely affected by the microscopic structure of the low-energy spectra of compound nuclei. The relativistic (quasiparticle) time blocking approximation (R(Q)TBA) has successfully provided a good description of the lowenergy strength, in particular, the strength associated with pygmy dipole resonance, describing transitions from and to the nuclear ground state. The finite-temperature generalization of this method is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(204 reference statements)
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as testified by the transition density displayed in Fig. 10, and of the corresponding wavefunction made out mainly of ph components with ε ph > ε F , namely (3s 1/2 → 3p 3/2 )n, (2d 5/2 → 3p 3/2 )n and (3s 1/2 → 3p 1/2 )n (see Table I of [110]). Increasing the temperature to T = 4 MeV, the strongest dipole state lying below 10 MeV, and carrying 72.4% of the 0-10 MeV strength, moves down in energy to E x = 2.55 MeV.…”
Section: V1 E1-strength Function and Transition Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…as testified by the transition density displayed in Fig. 10, and of the corresponding wavefunction made out mainly of ph components with ε ph > ε F , namely (3s 1/2 → 3p 3/2 )n, (2d 5/2 → 3p 3/2 )n and (3s 1/2 → 3p 1/2 )n (see Table I of [110]). Increasing the temperature to T = 4 MeV, the strongest dipole state lying below 10 MeV, and carrying 72.4% of the 0-10 MeV strength, moves down in energy to E x = 2.55 MeV.…”
Section: V1 E1-strength Function and Transition Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Let us conclude this section by noting that, if one would like to transform essentially any stable nucleus into systems displaying low-energy dipole modes, one has just to warm the system up, and study the γ-decay of the corresponding compound nucleus. Recent theoretical results [110,111] indicate the presence of PDR in hot nuclei at T ≈ 3 MeV, e.g.…”
Section: Giant Dipole- and Pygmy Dipole-resonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, employing effective interactions and the random phase approximation based on these interactions for the computation of the phonon characteristics provide quite a realistic description of the dynamical self-energy. In this work, we use the effective interaction of the covariant energy density functional (CEDF) [59,60] with the NL3 parametrization [68] and the relativistic random phase approximation [69] adopted to finite temperature in our previous developments for calculations of the phonon modes [4,5,67].…”
Section: Dyson Equation For the Fermionic Propagator At Finite Temper...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the behavior of atomic nuclei and nuclear matter at finite temperature is extremely important for advancements at the frontiers of the nuclear science. The modification of in-medium nucleonic correlations with temperature changes considerably the nuclear structure, leading to the transition to the non-superfluid phase, weakening of collective effects, the appearance of shape fluctuations, and the formation of new structures in the excitation spectra due to the thermal unblocking [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The microscopic interpretation of these phenomena is crucial for accurate predictions of nuclear processes in astrophysical environments, such as the neutron star mergers and supernovae [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most theoretical studies have focused on the strength function built on the ground state, finitetemperature methods enable the study of γSFs built on excited states. The finite-temperature quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) has been applied to calculate finite-temperature γSFs [20][21][22][23], and the zero-temperature QRPA with empirical corrections has also been applied to γSF calculations [24,25]. How-ever, the QRPA has limitations in that it only includes small-amplitude quantal fluctuations around the meanfield configuration, and its finite-temperature version has been mostly limited to spherical nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%