2000
DOI: 10.1155/2000/502753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear DNA Content and Chromatin Pattern of Rat Rhabdomyosarcoma Cell Sublines with Different Metastatic Potentials

Abstract: There is a constant need of features able to characterize potentially metastatic cells among the heterogeneous cell subpopulations which constitute a tumor. Image cytometry of metastatic tumor cells give rise to variable results, partly because of a heterogeneous origin of cells, or potential drug effects. The aim of this work was to characterize nuclear changes observed in metastatic cell clones issued in vitro from the same parental cell population The nuclear phenotypes of 6 cell sublines isolated from a ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, this report presents evidence for a radial higher order chromatin arrangement in a variety of different normal and malignant cell types, but suggests a decline in the gene density–correlated radial nuclear order of CTs in several tumor cell lines compared with their normal progenitor cells. The mechanisms leading to such a decline and to changes in heterochromatin patterns, such as increased amounts of facultative heterochromatin in the nuclear periphery ( Dufer et al, 2000 ), are not known. It is still an open question to which extent these changes are a consequence of or a cause for an altered gene expression pattern associated with changes of chromatin methylation and histone acetylation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, this report presents evidence for a radial higher order chromatin arrangement in a variety of different normal and malignant cell types, but suggests a decline in the gene density–correlated radial nuclear order of CTs in several tumor cell lines compared with their normal progenitor cells. The mechanisms leading to such a decline and to changes in heterochromatin patterns, such as increased amounts of facultative heterochromatin in the nuclear periphery ( Dufer et al, 2000 ), are not known. It is still an open question to which extent these changes are a consequence of or a cause for an altered gene expression pattern associated with changes of chromatin methylation and histone acetylation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They could be evaluated using unconventional methods of morphometry, based on fractal geometry [7]. This implies that the mostly irregular cell and nuclear components need not to undergo reductive representations and/or unrealistic approximations in order to be analyzed, as is usual in conventional morphometry when a single arbitrary scale is used to measure a large number of morphological features [8]. The irregularity and roughness of cell membranes and nuclear components (morphoultrastructural complexity) can be quantified by a single descriptive parameter, the fractal dimension (FD), while the true length contour and the actual surface area of biological bodies are obtained at the most suitable resolution scale [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 8226-Dox40 cells, significant variations were observed in E, and ENT, two features related to the spatial organization and distribution of the chromatin (15), and whose values are correlated neither to nuclear area nor to global chromatin condensation. Significant changes in chromatin higher-order organisation, evaluated through nuclear texture, have already been reported as markers of tumour cell aggressiveness or metastatic potential, either in experimental or clinical samples (22)(23)(24)(25). For instance, LM displays significant increases in invasive bladder tumours as compared to superficial tumours (25) and appears linked (together with E and GLD) to tumour size in breast carcinomas (unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%