Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. (31-07-2008)
REPORT DATE
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)AFRL/RVBYE
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
AFRL-RV-HA-TR-2008-1121
DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTWe report on the results of both a semi-empirical analysis and a case study in Xiuyan, China, that demonstrated that a correlation detector can lower magnitude detection thresholds by over one full unit for similar events as compared to a standard STA/LTA detector. 90 out of 90 events (100%) were detected by cross correlation for the case study whereas a procedure like the pIDC employs detected only 11%. We found that less than perfect matches still provided useful detections due to location, focal mechanism, and magnitude differences. Events with magnitude differences as large as 2.3 and 3.3 were shown to produce detection spikes on the correlation traces. Further work applied the correlation techniques on a larger scale to 5,000 events at Parkfield, California, and 19,000 events in and near China. We are attempting to see how broadly applicable correlation methods can be applied to different tectonic settings and for what percentage of the seismicity. 111 million correlations were performed on Lg-waves for the events in China at 363 stations. Final results indicate two thirds of the 19,000 events can be detected by cross correlation using this relatively sparse regional network. The full magnitude unit reduction in detection threshold is confirmed on a large scale in China and Parkfield.