2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear input for core-collapse models

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(284 reference statements)
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron capture on free protons and heavy nuclei during collapse reduces Y e (i.e., "deleptonizes" the collapsing core) and consequently decreases the size of the homologously collapsing inner core that depends on the average value of Y e in a roughly quadratic way (see, e.g., [56]). The material of the inner core is in sonic contact and determines the dynamics and the gravitational wave signal at core bounce and in the early postbounce phases.…”
Section: Deleptonization and Neutrino Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron capture on free protons and heavy nuclei during collapse reduces Y e (i.e., "deleptonizes" the collapsing core) and consequently decreases the size of the homologously collapsing inner core that depends on the average value of Y e in a roughly quadratic way (see, e.g., [56]). The material of the inner core is in sonic contact and determines the dynamics and the gravitational wave signal at core bounce and in the early postbounce phases.…”
Section: Deleptonization and Neutrino Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the input physics relevant during the collapse of the stellar core is very rich on the microscopic level (Martínez-Pinedo et al 2006), and this dynamical phase is very sensitive to small perturbations. The evolution of the collapsing core depends significantly on the adiabatic index of the equation of state, general relativistic effects, the electron capture rates on free protons and nuclei, and the coherent scattering opacities of neutrinos off the different nuclei.…”
Section: Core-collapse and Bouncementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, which shows the cluster distribution for a chosen thermodynamic condition ( temperature T = 1.6 MeV, baryonic density ρ = 3.3 · 10 11 gcm −3 , proton fraction Y p = 0.41) which is typical for the dynamics of supernova matter after the bounce and before the propagation of the shock wave [11,12]. We can see that the dominant cluster size is around A = 60, which is a particularly important size in the process of electron capture which determines the composition of the resulting neutron star [42][43][44][45][46][47]. It is clear that it is very important to correctly compute the abundances of such nuclei.…”
Section: Phenomenological Consequences Of Ensemble In-equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%