2004
DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.004929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Localization of NADPH:Cytochromec(P450) Reductase Enhances the Cytotoxicity of Mitomycin C to Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells

Abstract: Overexpression of endoplasmic reticulum-localized NADPH: cytochrome c (P450) reductase (NPR) in Chinese hamster ovary cells increases the hypoxic/aerobic differential toxicity of the mitomycins. Because considerable evidence indicates that DNA cross-links are the major cytotoxic lesions generated by the mitomycins, we proposed that bioactivation of the mitomycins in the nucleus close to the DNA target would influence the cytotoxicity of these drugs. The simian virus 40 large T antigen nuclear localization sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with many previous studies that demonstrate the important role of POR in MMC bioactivation (Belcourt et al, 1996;Seow et al, 2005), Flp-In CHO cells expressing wild-type human POR showed a remarkable increase in MMC-induced toxicity in comparison to the cells transfected with the expression vector alone (containing no POR cDNA). Microscopic examination showed that 24-h treatment of MMC (20 M) in the cells expressing wild-type POR caused abnormal changes in cell morphology and a significant reduction in the number of cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Consistent with many previous studies that demonstrate the important role of POR in MMC bioactivation (Belcourt et al, 1996;Seow et al, 2005), Flp-In CHO cells expressing wild-type human POR showed a remarkable increase in MMC-induced toxicity in comparison to the cells transfected with the expression vector alone (containing no POR cDNA). Microscopic examination showed that 24-h treatment of MMC (20 M) in the cells expressing wild-type POR caused abnormal changes in cell morphology and a significant reduction in the number of cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Differences between our findings and previous reports using CHO cells, with respect to sensitivity to MMC and cytochrome P450 reductase expression, may be due to methods used to assess cytotoxicity. While our growth inhibition assays showed no differences in MMC sensitivity between CHO-WT and CHO-OR cells following either a 3 h or a 4 day exposure, Belcourt et al (13) and Seow et al (14) reported increased sensitivity of their cytochrome P450 reductase overexpressing CHO cells when treated with MMC for 1 h. One can speculate that the sensitivity of the different cells to MMC may be due to differences in uptake and/or metabolism of the drug during the exposure. Belcourt et al (13) and Seow et al (14) also used clonogenic assays to assess cytotoxicity and it may be that this assay selects for cells with altered sensitivity to the drug.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…While our growth inhibition assays showed no differences in MMC sensitivity between CHO-WT and CHO-OR cells following either a 3 h or a 4 day exposure, Belcourt et al (13) and Seow et al (14) reported increased sensitivity of their cytochrome P450 reductase overexpressing CHO cells when treated with MMC for 1 h. One can speculate that the sensitivity of the different cells to MMC may be due to differences in uptake and/or metabolism of the drug during the exposure. Belcourt et al (13) and Seow et al (14) also used clonogenic assays to assess cytotoxicity and it may be that this assay selects for cells with altered sensitivity to the drug. Selected clones may express other enzymes reported to activate MMC such as DT-diaphorase (17, 35), NRH:quinone oxidoreductase 2 (37, 38), NADPH-ferrodoxin reductase (39) or cytochrome b5 reductase (9); they may also express antioxidants that detoxify and protect against ROS-induced damage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations