2019
DOI: 10.1306/01301918104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of porosity-preserving microcrystalline quartz coatings in Fontainebleau sandstones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak value and area of the curve represent the pore volume of the rock, and the curve peak's continuity reflects the pores' connectivity characteristics. The surface relaxivity was determined by combining the relaxation duration and the PSD which were acquired using different methods [19,[31][32][33]. Yao and Liu compared the specimen's T 2 spectrum of NMR with the PSD of MIP and demonstrated that specimen T 2 spectrum is superior in practicability and evaluation accuracy and can be used to study the distribution of pore throat structure [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak value and area of the curve represent the pore volume of the rock, and the curve peak's continuity reflects the pores' connectivity characteristics. The surface relaxivity was determined by combining the relaxation duration and the PSD which were acquired using different methods [19,[31][32][33]. Yao and Liu compared the specimen's T 2 spectrum of NMR with the PSD of MIP and demonstrated that specimen T 2 spectrum is superior in practicability and evaluation accuracy and can be used to study the distribution of pore throat structure [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transverse relaxation times measured at 2 MHz or 20 MHz (*), using a log-normal fitting of curves and calculated surface relaxivity (ρ2); (1) is Group1; (2) is Group 2 Each peak corresponds to one family of pores. Note that Group 2 (FB155) and Group 1 (FB 217 and FB 10) have similar pore sizes, but the former shows much shorter T2 times, therefore revealing a slight displacement towards shorter times (adapted fromJácomo et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…onde a razão # / deve ser estimada experimentalmente. 34 [35][36][37] Para um meio poroso, espera-se que o decaimento da magnetização não seja representado pelas Equações 8 e 9, uma vez que a magnetização é dada por:…”
Section: Rmn Em Meios Porososunclassified