2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.024501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts and paramagnetic field modifications inLa2CuO4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
25
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
15
25
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This may indicate slight differences in the orbital shift for different families. The new values for the orbital shift are much closer to what is expected from first principle calculations that predict an orbital shift anisotropy of about 2.4 [36].…”
Section: Contrasting Cu Shift Phenomenologysupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may indicate slight differences in the orbital shift for different families. The new values for the orbital shift are much closer to what is expected from first principle calculations that predict an orbital shift anisotropy of about 2.4 [36].…”
Section: Contrasting Cu Shift Phenomenologysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…While it is possible that the orbital shift in this direction does depend on the family of materials, there must be an unexplained, residual shift left at the lowest temperatures. Part of the evidence comes from the plot itself (as already mentioned), but also first principle calculations predicted an orbital shift anisotropy of K L, /K L,⊥ ≈ 2.4, a number that appears rather reliable also on general grounds [36], and hints at an orbital term K L, ≈ 0.85%, much closer to what we determine (K L, ≈ 1.05%) from Figure 7. We know from the HgBa 2 CuO 4+δ family, investigated with great care earlier [27,41], that this additional shift is probably present at Hg, as well as planar O, which favors a spin contribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 ). We display the total experimentally measured magnetic shift, K η (T ) = K Lη + K Sη (T ), which is the sum of a temperature and doping independent orbital part (K Lη ) 14 and the temperature and doping dependent spin part (K Sη ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it was done in Ref. 37 63 K L , however, is much smaller than that deduced from the data. The same discrepancy is also observed for hole doped cuprates.…”
Section: E Orbital Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 46%