1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.1.1958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Uranium Hydride and Deuteride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of a representative uranium(IV) bis(ketimide) complex, 11, is shown in Figure 6. This compound shows typical magnetic behavior for a U IV 5f 2 ion with a nominal 3 H 4 ground-state term and attains a χT product of 0.97 emu K mol -1 (2.78 µ B ) at 350 K, consistent with reported values for U IV complexes 27,[29][30][31][32][33] and only coincidentally close to the expected value of 1.0 emu K mol -1 for a simple S ) 1, g ) 2 Curie paramagnet. Compared to a J ) 4 Curie paramagnet, complex 11 exhibits a small but measurable temperature dependence.…”
Section: Uranium(iv) Fluoroketimidessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response of a representative uranium(IV) bis(ketimide) complex, 11, is shown in Figure 6. This compound shows typical magnetic behavior for a U IV 5f 2 ion with a nominal 3 H 4 ground-state term and attains a χT product of 0.97 emu K mol -1 (2.78 µ B ) at 350 K, consistent with reported values for U IV complexes 27,[29][30][31][32][33] and only coincidentally close to the expected value of 1.0 emu K mol -1 for a simple S ) 1, g ) 2 Curie paramagnet. Compared to a J ) 4 Curie paramagnet, complex 11 exhibits a small but measurable temperature dependence.…”
Section: Uranium(iv) Fluoroketimidessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This results in an admixture, making the quantum number J an ineffective reckoning for the accounting of states. The reality of the situation for many U IV complexes is that the admixture turns out to be small enough (<10% 6d 1 5f 1 contribution to the ground-state 6d 0 5f 2 configuration) that Russell-Saunders coupling can be used successfully, 29 especially in the context of a series of complexes such as those under investigation here.…”
Section: Uranium(iv) Fluoroketimidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been discussed either in terms of localized moments (incompatible with the itinerant nature of the 5f electrons) or itinerant magnetism. Whereas nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements seem to suggest localized 5f states for ␤-UH 3 and thus localized magnetism, 3 the magnetoelastic properties and pressure dependence of the magnetic moment point to the itinerant nature of magnetism. 4 Band structure calculations (nonrelativistic, non-self-consistent) came to the conclusion that there are both itinerant and localized f states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is primarily due to the very high reactivity of UH 3 , which is pyrophoric in powder form, and the absence of a protective overlayer preventing oxidation. Moreover, UH 3 is not stable and easily decomposes under vacuum: its dissociation pressure at 375 K is 0.27 Pa. 6 So any surface cleaning by heating or ion bombardment can itself result in the decomposition of the sample. Also, breaking under vacuum or scraping 7 may lead to dirty surfaces, because the breaking plane often contains impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second moments of 'H and 'H in B-UH3 contain a constant term and a term proportional to the square of the magnetization in the paramagnetic state, Grunzweig-Genossar, Kuznietz, and Meerovici [41]. At temperatures above 370"K, line narrowing was observed from which it was found E, = 0.36 f 0.4eV/atom for 'H and E, = 0.39 f 0.4eV/atom for 'H.…”
Section: Experimental A) Steady State Nmr Linewidths and Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%