2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear maturation and embryo development of porcine oocytes vitrified by cryotop: Effect of different stages of in vitro maturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that combinations of different CPAs give better results than the use of a single type of CPA in pigs [ 6 ] as well as in other mammalian species [ 7 ]. To date, three main vitrification techniques have been applied to porcine oocytes with various results: the SSV [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], Cryotop [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] and Open Pulled Straw (OPS) [ 15 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] methods. Although the main difference among these techniques is the cryodevice (i.e., the carrier that gives the distinctive name to each method), these methods also differ in terms of the CPA treatment including the type of sugars and permeating CPA, their concentrations during equilibration and the duration of equilibration ( Table 1…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that combinations of different CPAs give better results than the use of a single type of CPA in pigs [ 6 ] as well as in other mammalian species [ 7 ]. To date, three main vitrification techniques have been applied to porcine oocytes with various results: the SSV [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], Cryotop [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] and Open Pulled Straw (OPS) [ 15 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] methods. Although the main difference among these techniques is the cryodevice (i.e., the carrier that gives the distinctive name to each method), these methods also differ in terms of the CPA treatment including the type of sugars and permeating CPA, their concentrations during equilibration and the duration of equilibration ( Table 1…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 19 ] Cryotop 1 EG (4%) 15 min EG (35%) Trehalose (0.4 M) 30–60 sec GV: 4% [ 18 ] Cryotop 2 EG (7.5 → 15%) 1–4 min EG (30–35%) Sucrose (0.5–0.6 M) 30–60 sec GV: 40% (approx.) [ 13 , 16 , 20 ] MII: 80% (approx.) OPS 1 EG (10%) + DMSO (10%) 3 (5)–10 min EG (20%) + DMSO (20%) Sucrose (0.6 M) 30–50 sec MII: 68.2% [ 15 , 23 , 24 ] OPS 6 EG (5→10→15→20→25→30%) 12.5 min EG (40%) None 25 sec No data [ 21 ] OPS 1 EG (10%) + DMSO (10%) 90 sec EG (20%) + DMSO (20%) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After resuspension in prewarmed Tyrode's medium (TLH) containing 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA; TLH‐PVA; Funahashi, Cantley, & Day, 1997), oocytes with uniform cytoplasm and compact cumulus cells were selected under a stereo microscope (SZ61; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) for maturation. Groups of about 50 COCs were cultured in 500 μl of tissue culture medium 199 with Earle's salts (TCM199; Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 0.57 mM cysteine, 0.91 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 ng/ml EGF, 0.01 U/ml FSH (Sioux Biochemical, Sioux Center, IA), 0.01 U/ml LH (Sioux Biochemical) and 10% (v/v) porcine follicular fluid (Yuan & Krisher, 2010) at 38.5°C in 5% CO 2 and saturated humidity atmosphere for 42–44 hr (Wu et al, 2013). Matured oocytes were denuded in TLH‐PVA containing 0.1% (w/v) hyaluronidase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPAs function in a dual capacity by decreasing freezing temperature and increasing viscosity so that instead of crystallizing the syrupy solution becomes an amorphous ice; it 'vitrifies' . While conventional cryoprotectants, such as glycols and dimethyl sulfoxide, are intrinsically toxic to mammalian cells [14,15], Kuwayama [16] has argued that vitrification does not require high concentrations of CPAs such that under special conditions in which the cooling rate is equal to or greater than 107 o C/s [16,17], it is possible to induce vitrification with pure water (zero CPAs). Seki et al [18] also contend that there is an incorrect belief that vitrification is achieved only when cells are exposed to both high CPA levels and rapid cooling rates (>> 10,000 o C/min).…”
Section: Vitrification: High Warming and Cooling Rate Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%