Exa/Leap 2008 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02803-8_90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear periphery studied with antiprotonic atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value 0.11fm for 108 Sn in the table is estimated from the neutron rms radius 4.615 fm from [16] minus our point proton rms radius 4.50 fm. Finally, the value 0.55 fm in Table 4 for 208 Pb is estimated by employing the ratio of neutron radius/ proton radius equal to 1.07 ± 0.03 fm from [17] and our point proton rms radius 5.46 fm, i.e., 1.1*5.46 -5.46 = 0.55 fm. Other data somehow supporting our value 0.55 fm in Table 4 comes from [18] where the neutron radius is 6.7 fm, from [19] where this radius is 5.99 ± 0.10 fm, and from [20] where r n -r p = 0.33 ± 0.17 fm.…”
Section: Mean Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value 0.11fm for 108 Sn in the table is estimated from the neutron rms radius 4.615 fm from [16] minus our point proton rms radius 4.50 fm. Finally, the value 0.55 fm in Table 4 for 208 Pb is estimated by employing the ratio of neutron radius/ proton radius equal to 1.07 ± 0.03 fm from [17] and our point proton rms radius 5.46 fm, i.e., 1.1*5.46 -5.46 = 0.55 fm. Other data somehow supporting our value 0.55 fm in Table 4 comes from [18] where the neutron radius is 6.7 fm, from [19] where this radius is 5.99 ± 0.10 fm, and from [20] where r n -r p = 0.33 ± 0.17 fm.…”
Section: Mean Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%