2007
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/34/3/r01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear rainbow scattering and nucleus–nucleus potential

Abstract: Abstract. Elastic scattering of α-particle and some tightly-bound light nuclei has shown the pattern of rainbow scattering at medium energies, which is due to the refraction of the incident wave by a strongly attractive nucleus-nucleus potential. This review gives an introduction to the physics of the nuclear rainbow based essentially on the optical model description of the elastic scattering. Since the realistic nucleusnucleus optical potential (OP) is the key to explore this interesting process, an overview … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
316
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(820 reference statements)
11
316
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The def-WS model well reproduces measured σ R for [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Ne, and the results of the def-WS density with AMD deformation are consistent with those of the AMD density for [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]32 Ne and with that of the AMD-RGM density for 31 Ne. The def-WS model with AMD deformation is thus a handy way of simulating AMD or AMD-RGM densities.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The def-WS model well reproduces measured σ R for [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Ne, and the results of the def-WS density with AMD deformation are consistent with those of the AMD density for [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]32 Ne and with that of the AMD-RGM density for 31 Ne. The def-WS model with AMD deformation is thus a handy way of simulating AMD or AMD-RGM densities.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Recently, Nakamura et al [16] suggested through measurements of the one-neutron removal cross section of 31 Ne on C and Pb targets at 240 MeV/nucleon that 31 Ne is a halo nucleus that resides in the island of inversion. Takechi et al [17] measured σ I for Ne isotopes incident on 12 C targets at 240 MeV/nucleon and came to the same conclusion as Nakamura et al Very recently, Takechi et al measured σ R for [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Mg isotopes on C targets at 240 MeV/nucleon [18] and suggested that 37 Mg is a halo nucleus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent NSCL-MSU heavy ion data in combination with transport calculations are consistent with a value of E sym ≈ 31 MeV at ρ 0 and rule out extremely "stiff" and "soft" density dependences of the symmetry energy [21]. The same value has been extracted [18] from low energy elastic and (p,n) charge exchange reactions on isobaric analog states p( 6 He, 6 Li * )n measured at the HMI. At sub-normal densities recent data points have been extracted from the isoscaling behavior of fragment formation in low-energy heavy ion reactions with the corresponding experiments carried out at Texas A&M and NSCL-MSU [19].…”
Section: Pos(cpod07)060supporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, in the analysis of refractive α-nucleus scattering [23] and of light heavy-ion scattering [24,25] an imaginary potential with a shape different from the real potential was required to reproduce elastic scattering beyond the rainbow angle. A hybrid model, where the folding model is used to calculate the real potential and a Woods-Saxon (WS) form is used for the imaginary potential has been successfully used to describe α-and heavy-ion scattering data by several authors [12,21,22,[26][27][28][29][30]. A detailed study of the double-folding approach for α-nucleus scattering on targets in different mass regions was made by D. T. Khoa in 2001 [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%