1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02320322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear spin lattice relaxation of186ReFe and182TaFe: the role of spin wave mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In this way, the magnetic-field dependence of the relaxation is attributed to the magneticfield dependence of the enhancement factor. The EFM provided a description of the field dependence of the relaxation in polycrystalline samples, 6,7 and it was consistent with the main features of the field dependence in single-crystal samples, in particular, with the occurrence of peaks for certain directions of the magnetic field. 2 However, a critical experimental test of the EFM was still missing, because in polycrystalline samples, the field dependence of the enhancement factor is not well known, and the few relaxation experiments on single-crystal samples 8,9 had not been interpreted quantitatively by the EFM.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 In this way, the magnetic-field dependence of the relaxation is attributed to the magneticfield dependence of the enhancement factor. The EFM provided a description of the field dependence of the relaxation in polycrystalline samples, 6,7 and it was consistent with the main features of the field dependence in single-crystal samples, in particular, with the occurrence of peaks for certain directions of the magnetic field. 2 However, a critical experimental test of the EFM was still missing, because in polycrystalline samples, the field dependence of the enhancement factor is not well known, and the few relaxation experiments on single-crystal samples 8,9 had not been interpreted quantitatively by the EFM.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Nevertheless, the previous interpretation of those experiments is of interest, because it seemed to support the assumption = 2: The field dependence of the relaxation could be described by the EFM and =2, if B was parametrized by B a + B ext , and B a was adjusted via least squares fit. 6,7,53,54 However, B a and are strongly correlated, and over a fairly large magnetic-field region, a wrong choice of one of those parameters can be compensated by a wrong choice of the other parameter. This was demonstrated in this work for 186 IrFe: The field dependence of R could almost equally well be described by = 1.39 and the "correct" B a or by = 2 and a "wrong," distinctly larger B a .…”
Section: Other Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All calculated rates are too small by a factor of 2-5. This can be interpreted as an indication that an important relaxation mechanism is missing in his model [5]. At present, however, it cannot be stated whether this missing mechanism is the relaxation via electronic spin waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This increase is attributed to the interaction of 191 Pt with nuclear magnons originating from the 59 Co nuclear spin system. [ The nuclear spin-lattice relaxation (NSLR) of impurity nuclei in the ferromagnetic host lattices Fe, Co, and Ni has been the subject of many investigations, both experimental and theoretical [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Nevertheless, not all mechanisms which are responsible for the relaxation process are understood in detail.…”
Section: G Seewald E Hagn and E Zechmentioning
confidence: 99%