1959
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.113.1504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Spin Relaxation in Normal and Superconducting Aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

18
234
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 655 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
18
234
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the magnetization recovery did not follow a simple exponential law in the SC state, rather a stretched exponential behavior indicating a distribution of relaxation times [20], likely due to misaligned crystallites and the vortex state. The T 2 behavior is indeterminate as to the orbital structure of the Cooper pairs, however the salient features are that 1/T 1 decreases as a power law and there is no evidence of a Hebel-Slichter coherence peak [21]. With these factors considered, it is likely that U 2 PtC 2 does not have a fully gapped Fermi surface, rather a nodal structure, the details of which may become more clear from measurements on single crystals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We note that the magnetization recovery did not follow a simple exponential law in the SC state, rather a stretched exponential behavior indicating a distribution of relaxation times [20], likely due to misaligned crystallites and the vortex state. The T 2 behavior is indeterminate as to the orbital structure of the Cooper pairs, however the salient features are that 1/T 1 decreases as a power law and there is no evidence of a Hebel-Slichter coherence peak [21]. With these factors considered, it is likely that U 2 PtC 2 does not have a fully gapped Fermi surface, rather a nodal structure, the details of which may become more clear from measurements on single crystals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The NMR rate in the presence of a spin-singlet swave superconducting state is enhanced just below a critical temperature T c , owing to the coherence factor [23]. This coherence peak (Hebel-Slichter peak) [24,25] comes from the formation of superconducting gaps. The absence of the peak and a power-law behavior of T −1 1 at low temperatures indicate the occurrence of unconventional states [26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies showing up the so called Hebel-Slichter peak in the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate (NSLRR) played a significant role in establishing the BCS theory as the first microscopic description of conventional (weakly coupled) superconductors. 2 Physically, this behavior is caused by the coherence factors and the symmetry of a single nodeless superconducting (SC) gap. 3 Nowadays, within a simplified approach (ignoring damping, strong coupling, anisotropy, impurity, and inhomogeneity effects 4,5 ) its presence or absence together with the T -dependence of the NSLRR, 1/T 1 , below T c are frequently used to discriminate tentatively conventional from unconventional pairing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%