1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.52.3103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear structure effects in the sub-barrier fusion ofO16+Ge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 16 O+ 76 Ge, the low-lying vibrational 2 + and 3 − one-phonon states of the target, the same ones used in Ref. [26], and their mutual excitations were included in the calculations (see dashed lines in the figure). The higher excitation energy of the 3 − one-phonon state in 16 O only produces an adiabatic potential renormalization without affecting the structure in the BD [27], and, consequently, was not included in the CC calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 16 O+ 76 Ge, the low-lying vibrational 2 + and 3 − one-phonon states of the target, the same ones used in Ref. [26], and their mutual excitations were included in the calculations (see dashed lines in the figure). The higher excitation energy of the 3 − one-phonon state in 16 O only produces an adiabatic potential renormalization without affecting the structure in the BD [27], and, consequently, was not included in the CC calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both (a) and (b), projectile and target are prolate-deformed. The experimental data for these reactions are taken from Aguilera et al [22] and Newton et al [23], respectively.…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 16 O+ 76 Ge system, the low-lying vibrational 2 + and 3 -onephonon states of the target, the same ones used in Ref. [27], as well as their mutual excitations were included in the calculations (see the dashed line in the figure). The higher excitation energy of the 3 -one-phonon state of 16 O only produces an adiabatic potential renormalization without affecting the structure in the BD [28], and, consequently, was not included in the CC calculations.…”
Section: O+mentioning
confidence: 99%