2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32239-7_78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathological Images Using Two-Stage Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method outperformed present state-of-the-art methods on the two datasets (described in section "Datasets") in the integrity of the segmentation of a single nucleus and the segmentation accuracy, and especially in the segmentation of overlapped nuclei regions. We compared our method against several deep learning based methods listed in Table 1, such as FCN-8 (Long et al, 2015), Mask R-CNN (He et al, 2015), U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015), CNN3 (Kumar et al, 2017), DIST (Naylor et al, 2019), SUNets, U-Net (DLA), a two-stage U-net (Mahbod et al, 2019), and two-stage learning U-Net (DLA) (Kang et al, 2019). In order to make the comparison objectively, we followed the same training and testing set split criteria suggested by Kumar et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our method outperformed present state-of-the-art methods on the two datasets (described in section "Datasets") in the integrity of the segmentation of a single nucleus and the segmentation accuracy, and especially in the segmentation of overlapped nuclei regions. We compared our method against several deep learning based methods listed in Table 1, such as FCN-8 (Long et al, 2015), Mask R-CNN (He et al, 2015), U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015), CNN3 (Kumar et al, 2017), DIST (Naylor et al, 2019), SUNets, U-Net (DLA), a two-stage U-net (Mahbod et al, 2019), and two-stage learning U-Net (DLA) (Kang et al, 2019). In order to make the comparison objectively, we followed the same training and testing set split criteria suggested by Kumar et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmentation results of our algorithm are further illustrated in Figure 3, where we selected two examples of segmentation at random and compared them with the GT. We also applied our method on the TNBC dataset and compared the experimental results with other methods (Table 3)-DeconvNet (Noh et al, 2015), FCN-8 (Long et al, 2015), U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015), Ensemble method (Naylor et al, 2017), DIST (Naylor et al, 2019), and two-stage learning U-Net (DLA) method (Kang et al, 2019). Our method has the top AJI value (AJI = 0.621) but the second highest F1 score (F1 score = 0.806).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these connections are shallow and linear [28] . There have many previous works intend to tackle this issue [14] . Based on these works, in our approach we present a novel feature aggregation paradigm: dense deep layer aggregation to further strengthen the skip connection.…”
Section: Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the skip connection is just pure copy and paste, therefore it is still linear and shallow [28] . In [14], the skip connection is extended by DLA. However, it eliminates the shortcut path for gradients propagation.…”
Section: Dense Deep Layer Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%