In this paper we provide a cytogenetic analysis of Paratelmatobius cardosoi and Paratelmatobius poecilogaster. The karyotypes of both species showed a diploid number of 24 chromosomes and shared some similarity in the morphology of some pairs. On the other hand, pairs 4 and 6 widely differed between these complements. These karyotypes also differed in their NOR number and location. Size heteromorphism was seen in all NOR-bearing chromosomes of the two karyotypes. In addition, both karyotypes showed small centromeric C-bands and a conspicuous heterochromatic band in the short arm of chromosome 1, although with a different size in each species. The P. curdosoi complement also showed other strongly stained non-centromeric C-bands, with no counterparts in the P. curdosoi karyotype. Chromosome staining with fluorochromes revealed heterogeneity in the base composition of two of the non-centromeric C-bands of P . curdosoi.Comparison of the chromosomal morphology of these Parutelmatohius karyotypes with that of P. Iutzii showed that the P . poeciloguster karyotype is more similar to that of P . lutzii than P. cardosoi. These cytogenetic results agree with the proposed species arrangements in the P. curdosoi and P. lutzii groups based on morphological and ecological data. SP, The genus Paratelmatobius Lutz and Carvalho is endemic to Brazil and comprises the species P. lutzii, P. gaigeae, P. poecilogaster, P. cardosoi and P. mantiqueira (see review by POMBAL JR. and HADDAD 1999). Paratelmatobius species are usually rare, and P. gaigeae, P. lutzii and P. mantiqueira may be considered as missing species (POMBAL JR. and HADDAD 1999). Based on morphological and ecological data, POMBAL JR. and HADDAD (1999) recognized two species groups, the P. cardosoi group and the P. lutzii group, in this genus. The former group contains P. cardosoi and P. mantiqueira and the P. lutzii group encompasses P. lutzii, P. poecilogaster, and probably P. gaigeae.
Shirlei Muriu Recco-Pimentel, Departamenin de Biologia Cellular, IB Universidude Esradual de Cumpinas (UNICAMP)The intergeneric phylogenetic relationships of this group are not yet clear. LYNCH (1971) considered Paratelmatobius a member of the subfamily Leptodactylinae and pointed out some morphological similarities among Paratelmatobius, Scythrophrys, Physalaemus and, to a lesser extent, Zachaenus. This classification was followed by FROST (1999). HEYER (1975) Paratelmatobius grouped together with the genera Scythrophrys, Zuchaenus, Thoropa, Megaelosia, Hylodes, Cycloramphus, Crossodactylus, Crossodactylodes and Craspedoglossa. The proximity between the genera Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys, suggested by LYNCH (1971) andHEYER (1975), was also indicated by GARCIA (1996). Based on ecological and morphological characters, GARCIA (1 996) suggested a closer relationship between Scythrophrys and P. gaigeae ( = P. cardosoi sensu POMBAL JR. and HAD-DAD 1999) than between this species of Paratelmatobius and P. lutzii, and suggested a revision of both of these genera.The cytogenetic informatio...