2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.034510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleon mass and isovector couplings in 2+1 -flavor dynamical domain-wall lattice QCD near physical mass

Abstract: We report nucleon mass, isovector vector and axial-vector charges, and tensor and scalar couplings, calculated using two recent 2+1-flavor dynamical domain-wall fermions lattice-QCD ensembles generated jointly by the RIKEN-BNL-Columbia and UKQCD collaborations. These ensembles were generated with Iwasaki × dislocation-suppressing-determinant-ratio gauge action at inverse lattice spacing of 1.378 (7) GeV and pion mass values of 249.4(3) and 172.3(3) MeV. The nucleon mass extrapolates to a value mN = 0.950(5) Ge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical significance of these results ranges dependent on renormalizations used for the axialvector current [23,24,35]: From about three standard deviations with the renormalization obtained in the meson-sector calculation to about five standard deviations with the renormalization using the nucleon vector charge. We note the corresponding vector charge calculation suggests possible contamination from nearby excited states [23,24,[35][36][37], in contrast to earlier DWF calculations that did not find any evidence for such contamination [25,35].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistical significance of these results ranges dependent on renormalizations used for the axialvector current [23,24,35]: From about three standard deviations with the renormalization obtained in the meson-sector calculation to about five standard deviations with the renormalization using the nucleon vector charge. We note the corresponding vector charge calculation suggests possible contamination from nearby excited states [23,24,[35][36][37], in contrast to earlier DWF calculations that did not find any evidence for such contamination [25,35].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…We have been working at physical mass for a while [9,10]. We have used some of these DWF ensembles for studying nucleon [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. We found a deficit [11] in calculated isovector axial charge, , in comparison with its experimental value [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the corresponding vector charge calculation suggests possible contamination from near by excited states [23,24], in contrast to earlier DWF calculations that did not find any evidence for such contamination [25], the form factor calculations presented here can shed some light on this possible contamination from excited states [35,36]. The results presented here were calculated using the "48I" 48 3 × 96 2+1-flavor dynamical Möbius DWF ensemble at physical mass with Iwasaki gauge action of gauge coupling, 𝛽 = 2.13, or of lattice cut off of 𝑎 −1 = 1.730(4) GeV, jointly generated by the RBC and UKQCD Collaborations [9].…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…We have used some of these DWF ensembles for studying nucleon [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. We found deficit [11] in calculated isovector axial charge, 𝑔 𝐴 , in comparison with its experimental value [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are all in good agreement with each other, demonstrating the consistency of the LQCD extrapolations. The scatter points (LHP+RBC+UKQCD [26], PACS 22 (128 4 ) [27], PACS 22 (160 4 ) [28], PACS 21 [29,30], and CalLat 21 [31]) denote single-ensemble results. Although these results could have unquantified systematic biases, the results are all still in agreement with each other and with the fully extrapolated results, suggesting that the unknown systematics are likely to be small.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%