2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)00415-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleophilic displacement of homoallylic tosylates: influence of steric hindrance and conformational rigidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, with the exception of a couple of examples reporting the conversion of 1-BuOTs [26] and homoallylic tosylates [34] into the corresponding nitro compounds, to the best of our knowledge, no general methods are available in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, with the exception of a couple of examples reporting the conversion of 1-BuOTs [26] and homoallylic tosylates [34] into the corresponding nitro compounds, to the best of our knowledge, no general methods are available in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the superior reactivity of tosylate over halides in typical bimolecular nucleophilic substitution, the bulky tosylate displayed inferior reactivity compared to the much smaller chloride, yielding 3 g (38%) and 15 (45%). The steric hindrance and conformational rigidity could possibly account for the reverse trend of the above leaving group ability . Expectedly, the faster reaction was with bromide as leaving group compared to tosylate in the case of the reaction of bromomethyl radical with 14 , giving the cyclopropanes 11 and 15 in a ratio of 1:3.3 with a total yield of 78%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steric hindrance and conformational rigidity could possibly account for the reverse trend of the above leaving group ability. [21] Expectedly, the faster reaction was with bromide as leaving group compared to tosylate in the case of the reaction of bromomethyl radical with 14, giving the cyclopropanes 11 and 15 in a ratio of 1:3.3 with a total yield of 78%. Of note, the ratio of tosylate and halo-containing cyclopropane was decreased with the reaction time extending, suggesting the contamination reaction of the substitution of tosylate with halide ion under this visible-lightmediated reaction conditions.…”
Section: Communications Ascwiley-vchdementioning
confidence: 99%