2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa8891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleosynthesis in 2D core-collapse supernovae of 11.2 and 17.0 Mprogenitors: implications for Mo and Ru production

Abstract: Abstract. Core-collapse supernovae are the first polluters of heavy elements in the galactic history. As such, it is important to study the nuclear compositions of their ejecta, and understand their dependence on the progenitor structure (e.g., mass, compactness, metallicity). Here, we present a detailed nucleosynthesis study based on two long-term, two-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of a 11.2 M and a 17.0 M star. We find that in both models nuclei well beyond the iron group (up to Z ≈ 44) can… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But in standard CC SNe, the matter is mainly ejected by neutrinos, which reduce the number of neutrons by converting them into protons. In such conditions, current simulations indicate that standard CC SNe could at most produce trans-iron elements like Sr, Y, Zr, Mo, and Ru (first-peak elements), and perhaps in some cases elements up to Ag (e.g., Roberts et al 2010;Arcones & Montes 2011;Eichler et al 2018;Bliss et al 2018 and references therein). In order to produce heavier elements such as Eu, another ejection mechanism is necessary.…”
Section: C2 Core-collapse Supernovaementioning
confidence: 84%
“…But in standard CC SNe, the matter is mainly ejected by neutrinos, which reduce the number of neutrons by converting them into protons. In such conditions, current simulations indicate that standard CC SNe could at most produce trans-iron elements like Sr, Y, Zr, Mo, and Ru (first-peak elements), and perhaps in some cases elements up to Ag (e.g., Roberts et al 2010;Arcones & Montes 2011;Eichler et al 2018;Bliss et al 2018 and references therein). In order to produce heavier elements such as Eu, another ejection mechanism is necessary.…”
Section: C2 Core-collapse Supernovaementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Arlandini et al 1999;Käppeler et al 2011;Prantzos et al 2020), might combine a number of different contributions. Especially the light trans-Fe elements like Sr, Y, Zr, seem to have also other origins aside from the typical r-process (Travaglio et al 2004;Fröhlich et al 2006;Farouqi et al 2009;Hansen et al 2012Hansen et al , 2014aEichler et al 2018;Akram et al 2020) which could possibly be attributed to regular core-collapse supernovae. When looking at the SAGA database (only for Milky Way stars) in this metallicity window, one recognizes that one finds Fe and Sr detections in 1277 of them, but Fe and Eu detections only in 498 stars (combined with a strong scatter in the Eu abundances).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have found out that proton-rich winds may be predominant contributors to the solar abundance of 98 Ru, significant contributions to those of 96 Ru (≲40%) and 92 Mo (≲27%), and relatively minor contributions to that of 94 Mo (≲14%). The production of 92 Mo and 94 Mo is observed in slightly neutron-rich conditions in 11 and 17 M  simulations, 96,98 Ru can only be produced efficiently via the νpprocess and heavily depends on the presence of very proton-rich material in the ejecta (Eichler et al, 2018). SNIa have been suggested as a site for the production of pnuclides for the abundance ratios 92 Mo/ 94 Mo (Travaglio et al, 2015, Nishimura et al, 2018.…”
Section: Mo and Ru Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 96%