1986
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)81021-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleotide binding to elongation factor 2 inactivated by diphtheria toxin

Abstract: Binding of g~nosine nucIeotid~ to puriikd native and ADP-~~syiat~ wheat germ EF-2 was measured. Both forms of EF-2 hound t3aGDP to the same extent.[3H]GDP binding to native but not to ADP-ribosylated EF-2 was reduced in the presence of GTF and ribosomes. Binding of [Y-~~P]GTP to EF-2 was significantly reduced upon ADP-ribosylation. ADP-ribosylation almost abolished both the stimulatory effect of ribosomes on GTP binding to EF-2 and the ability of EF-2 to form a high-affinity complex with GuoPP(CH&P and ribosom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar K D values for GTP and GDP binding to yeast eEF2 are in contrast to previous results for both prokaryotic EF-G and eukaryotic eEF2 in the absence of ribosomes where the K D for GDP binding is significantly lower than for GTP (53,54). In addition, our observation that the binding affinity of eEF2 for GTP and GDP is unaffected by ADP-ribosylation disagrees with previous results showing the affinity for GTP to wheat germ ADPR-eEF2 was significantly reduced (32).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similar K D values for GTP and GDP binding to yeast eEF2 are in contrast to previous results for both prokaryotic EF-G and eukaryotic eEF2 in the absence of ribosomes where the K D for GDP binding is significantly lower than for GTP (53,54). In addition, our observation that the binding affinity of eEF2 for GTP and GDP is unaffected by ADP-ribosylation disagrees with previous results showing the affinity for GTP to wheat germ ADPR-eEF2 was significantly reduced (32).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This could allow initial binding and GTP hydrolysis, which has been shown for EF-G to be a very early event in translocation (5). Other reports have indicated a marked decrease in the ability of ADPR-eEF2 to associate with the 80 S ribosome (32)(33)(34)(35) as well as a significant reduction in binding and hydrolysis of GTP upon ADP-ribosylation (32,35). Furthermore, ADPR-eEF2 binds weaker than eEF2 to a synthetic oligonucleotide (SRD RNA) mimicking the sarcin/ricin loop of 28 S ribosomal RNA (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others have shown that ADP R -eEF2 displays a specific defect in binding to pretranslocation ribosomes (21). Furthermore, early studies reported that ADP R -eEF2 showed a decrease in GTP binding (22) whereas more recent fluorescent analyses showed no difference in GTP binding by ADP R -eEF2 (18). Taken together, these biochemical experiments suggest that ADP R -eEF2 is able to bind GTP and the ribosome but is unable either to efficiently or accurately promote translocation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The mutant toxins were also examined for changes in conformational state as a function of pH, using the fluorescent probe TNS, which exhibits a higher quantum yield in nonpolar than in polar media (Burns et al, 1986;Collins & Collier, 1987). Mutant or $wt toxin (100 nM) was incubated with TNS (150 pM) for 15 min at room temperature in buffers at varying pH before readings were taken.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%