2020
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleus preservation in early Ediacaran Weng'an embryo-like fossils, experimental taphonomy of nuclei and implications for reading the eukaryote fossil record

Abstract: The challenge of identifying fossilized organelles has long hampered attempts to interpret the fossil record of early eukaryote evolution. We explore this challenge through experimental taphonomy of nuclei in a living eukaryote and microscale physical and chemical characterization of putative nuclei in embryo-like fossils from the early Ediacaran Weng'an Biota. The fossil nuclei exhibit diverse preservational modes that differ in shape, presence or absence of an inner body and the chemistry of the associated m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, replication bands vestiges in fossilized macronuclear nodules are foreseeable, even though preservation of actual ancient DNA content is unlikely. Remarkably, recent findings, accompanied by experimental taphonomy results, suggest that fossilization of microeukaryote nuclei is more common than previously thought to be possible 18 , 19 . On the other hand, preservation of ciliary structures seems rare, as they tend degrade during resin embedding 14 , even though structures interpreted as flagella were found in inclusions identified as fossilized flagellates 16 , 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hence, replication bands vestiges in fossilized macronuclear nodules are foreseeable, even though preservation of actual ancient DNA content is unlikely. Remarkably, recent findings, accompanied by experimental taphonomy results, suggest that fossilization of microeukaryote nuclei is more common than previously thought to be possible 18 , 19 . On the other hand, preservation of ciliary structures seems rare, as they tend degrade during resin embedding 14 , even though structures interpreted as flagella were found in inclusions identified as fossilized flagellates 16 , 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Third, a large number of specimens possess large intracellular structures (LISs) (figure 1k) and small spherical granules within the cells. The origin of the LISs has been much more contentious [7,22,23,39]; however, based on highresolution reconstructions and computed tomographic quantitative analysis as well as comprehensive taphonomic analysis, they have been shown to be cell nuclei [40,41].…”
Section: (A) Type 1: Ediacaran Embryo-like Fossils With Equal and Synchronous Cleavagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unique to eukaryotes are: (1) multiple diploid, linear chromosomes (Goodenough and Heitman, 2014); (2) segregation of chromosomes into a nucleus; (3) mitochondria (Margulis and Fester, 1991); and (4) other structures, such as the endoplasmic reticulum (Butterfield, 2015). 'Eukaryotic' fossil cells are recognizable as larger than contemporary prokaryotes, with evidence of nuclei (Sun et al, 2020). Eukaryotes first appear about 1.6-1.8 BYA, but remain relatively minor components of ecosystems for another billion years, until about 635 MYA when the Cambrian MST occurred (Butterfield, 2000;Knoll et al, 2006;Knoll, 2011).…”
Section: Prokaryotes To Eukaryotesmentioning
confidence: 99%