2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nudging the adaptive thermal comfort model

Abstract: The release of the largest database of thermal comfort field studies presents an opportunity to perform a quality assurance exercise on the first generation adaptive comfort standards (ASHRAE 55 and EN15251). The analytical procedure used to develop the ASHRAE 55 adaptive standard was replicated on 60,321 comfort questionnaire records with accompanying measurement data. Results validated the standard's current adaptive comfort model for naturally ventilated buildings, while suggesting several potential nudges … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A differentiation of acoustic criteria between mechanical and natural ventilated buildings has already been advocated in the literature, starting from an analogy with thermal comfort criteria [104,105]. Indeed, standards on thermal comfort provide different criteria and models, on the basis of "different thermal experiences, changes in clothing, availability of control, and shifts in occupant expectations" occurring in naturally ventilated buildings [111], that have led to the definition of the adaptive thermal comfort model [112][113][114]. Similarly, according to Field, a different noise sensitivity could be assumed under NV conditions, resulting in higher noise levels to be tolerated, because of the following: (i) a lower expectation of low noise levels, (ii) the appreciation of non-acoustic benefits and (iii) a different availability of control in comparison to mechanically ventilated buildings [104,105].…”
Section: The Lack Of a Perceptual Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A differentiation of acoustic criteria between mechanical and natural ventilated buildings has already been advocated in the literature, starting from an analogy with thermal comfort criteria [104,105]. Indeed, standards on thermal comfort provide different criteria and models, on the basis of "different thermal experiences, changes in clothing, availability of control, and shifts in occupant expectations" occurring in naturally ventilated buildings [111], that have led to the definition of the adaptive thermal comfort model [112][113][114]. Similarly, according to Field, a different noise sensitivity could be assumed under NV conditions, resulting in higher noise levels to be tolerated, because of the following: (i) a lower expectation of low noise levels, (ii) the appreciation of non-acoustic benefits and (iii) a different availability of control in comparison to mechanically ventilated buildings [104,105].…”
Section: The Lack Of a Perceptual Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the thermal comfort, we used the adaptative comfort approach according to the ASHRAE55-2017 standard included in the Design Builder software for naturally ventilated buildings. This method has been proven to be useful for mixed-mode buildings such as ours (i.e., a combination of operable windows and mechanical conditioning) [44]. An annual simulation was run at intervals of one hour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three case studies are used to demonstrate how to apply the proposed arPMV as well as to verify the effectiveness of the proposed arPMV in improving thermal sensation prediction. In future studies, to develop general thermal comfort models for updating thermal comfort standards and practical applications, the proposed arPMV shall be applied to a large database (ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II) to acquire a table of the q and p values for different building types taking into consideration the effects of gender, age, climate etc 65‐67 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%