2018
DOI: 10.1101/285239
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuisance Effects and the Limitations of Nuisance Regression in Dynamic Functional Connectivity fMRI

Abstract: In resting-state fMRI, dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) measures are used to characterize temporal changes in the brain's intrinsic functional connectivity. A widely used approach for DFC estimation is the computation of the sliding window correlation between blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals from di↵erent brain regions. Although the source of temporal fluctuations in DFC estimates remains largely unknown, there is growing evidence that they may reflect dynamic shifts between functional bra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work significantly extends the preliminary results regarding static FC estimates presented in Nalci et al (2019). We provide a more extensive analysis of various nuisance effects on the FC estimates before and after NR.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Our work significantly extends the preliminary results regarding static FC estimates presented in Nalci et al (2019). We provide a more extensive analysis of various nuisance effects on the FC estimates before and after NR.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, dFC methods are relatively new, and gold standards have yet to be agreed upon with respect to sliding window parameters such as window length and overlap. Indeed, some have raised doubts about the reliability of sliding window methods, and the degree to which resulting states represent true FC configurations (Laumann et al, ; Nalci, Rao, & Liu, ; Shakil, Lee, & Keilholz, ). For example, in heterogeneous samples, differences in dFC measures may arise from nonneuronal sources of variability (Lehmann, White, Henson, Cam, & Geerligs, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the statistical significance of the estimated connection, we used an autoregressive (AR) bootstrap procedure (40,41) to preserve the power spectrum density (PSD) of BOLD signals. For a specific estimated connection, denoted as element (i, j), our null hypothesis was that signal x i and x j are independent regardless of other nodes' influence.…”
Section: Significance Test Of the Estimated Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bootstrap procedure [5,12] to preserve the power spectrum density (PSD) of BOLD signals. For a specific estimated connection, denoted as element (i, j), our null hypothesis was that signal x i and…”
Section: Significance Test Of the Estimated Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%