2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2013.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Null controllability of a parabolic equation involving the Grushin operator in some multi-dimensional domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controllability for degenerate parabolic equations in dimension one has been studied widely in recent years by many authors (see e.g., [2,[7][8][9][10][11]18,19]). The null controllability of parabolic equations involving the Grushin operator has been studied first in dimension two [4], and then in some multi-dimensional domains [3,5]. On the other hand, the controllability results of parabolic equations with an inverse-square potential were obtained in [14,19] for the case of internal singularity, and in [13] for the case of boundary singularity.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The controllability for degenerate parabolic equations in dimension one has been studied widely in recent years by many authors (see e.g., [2,[7][8][9][10][11]18,19]). The null controllability of parabolic equations involving the Grushin operator has been studied first in dimension two [4], and then in some multi-dimensional domains [3,5]. On the other hand, the controllability results of parabolic equations with an inverse-square potential were obtained in [14,19] for the case of internal singularity, and in [13] for the case of boundary singularity.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…×(0,T ) ξC 14 Me −2Mσ (t(T − t)) 3 |∇w| 2 dxdt ≤ − Ω 1 ×(0,T )Gn,μw C 14 Mwξe −2Mσ (t(T − t))3 dxdt+ Ω 1 ×(0,T ) C 14 M |w| 2 e −2Mσ 2(t(T − t)) 3 Δξ − 4M ∇ξ • ∇σ + ρ 4M 2 |∇σ| 2 − 2M Δσ dxdt + Ω 1 ×(0,T ) C 14 Mξ|w| 2 e −2Mσ (t(T − t)) 3 μ |x| 2 − 2Mσt − 3 T − 2t (t(T − t)) 4 dxdt ≤ 1 (0,T ) |e −Mσ Gn,μw| 2 dxdt + ω 1 ×(0,T ) C 15 M 3 e −2Mσ (t(T − t)) 9 |w| 2 dxdtfor some positive constant C 15 = C 15 (β, ξ). Here, we have used the fact that 0 R N 1 / ∈ω 1 and supp(ξ), supp(Δξ), supp(∇ξ) ⊂ ω 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for all large s ≥ s 1 , λ ≥ λ 1 and z = θv ε . In order to eliminate the boundary term, we introduce a cut-function χ ∈ C 2 (I) such that      χ(x, y) = 0, (x, y) ∈ ω (1) , 0 < χ(x, y) < 1, (x, y) ∈ ω (2)(1) , χ(x, y) = 1, (x, y) ∈ I\ω (2) .…”
Section: Lemma 34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x, y, t)dB(t), (x, y, t) ∈ Q T , u(x, y, t) = 0, (x, y, t) ∈ Σ T , u(x, y, 0) = 0, (x, y) ∈ I, When no singular term was involved, the null controllability of deterministic Grushin equation with I = (−1, 1) × (0, 1) was studied in [2,3]. The null controllability for Grushintype equations was obtained for any time T > 0 and for any degeneracy γ > 0, with a control that acts on one strip, touching the degeneracy line {x = 0} in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation