2020
DOI: 10.1162/ling_a_00342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Null Objects in Korean: Experimental Evidence for the Argument Ellipsis Analysis

Abstract: Null object (NO) constructions in Korean and Japanese have received different accounts: as (a) argument ellipsis ( Oku 1998 , S. Kim 1999 , Saito 2007 , Sakamoto 2015 ), (b) VP-ellipsis after verb raising ( Otani and Whitman 1991 , Funakoshi 2016 ), or (c) instances of base-generated pro ( Park 1997 , Hoji 1998 , 2003 ). We report results from two experiments supporting the argument ellipsis analysis for Korean. Experiment 1 builds on K.-M. Kim and Han’s (2016) finding of interspeaker variation in whether the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The speaker's variation seems to support our claim that missing clausal complement is closely tied to the presence of pronominal replacement. As pointed out by Han et al (2020), in the case of speakers' variation, there is a correlation between related phenomena. A speaker's acceptance of null clausal complement seems to positively correlate with acceptance of replacement by kukes 'it'.…”
Section: I-topmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The speaker's variation seems to support our claim that missing clausal complement is closely tied to the presence of pronominal replacement. As pointed out by Han et al (2020), in the case of speakers' variation, there is a correlation between related phenomena. A speaker's acceptance of null clausal complement seems to positively correlate with acceptance of replacement by kukes 'it'.…”
Section: I-topmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If we defend an analysis in terms of pro, indefinite NSs and NOs are equivalent to a null pronominal. The alternative view is an analysis in terms of ellipsis (Cyrino 2001(Cyrino , 2016(Cyrino , 2019Duguine 2014;Giannakidou & Merchant 1997;Han et al 2020;Paparounas & Sitaridou 2018;Saito 2007;Takahashi 2008Takahashi , 2013Takahashi , 2014. If NSs and NOs are deleted arguments, and there is no empty category in internal argument position, definiteness could be dispensed with.…”
Section: Towards a Unified Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have argued that null arguments are better analyzed involving argument ellipsis (Kim 1999;Oku 1998aOku , 1998b. Most pieces of evidence for Argument Ellipsis (henceforth, AE) come from Asian languages, such as Korean (Han et al 2020), Japanese (Saito 2007;Takahashi 2008Takahashi , 2013Takahashi , 2014 and Javanese (Sato 2014), but also from Hebrew (Landau 2018), Turkish and Malayalam (Takahashi 2013).…”
Section: In Favor Of An Analysis As Argument Ellipsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a distinction can be drawn between randomized between-subject designs, of the type just described, and non-randomized within-subject designs, also known as repeated measures designs, where each subject is exposed to all levels of the independent variable being manipulated, thereby controlling for differences across groups and allowing for causation to be tested directly (Charness et al 2012). For example, Han et al (2020) investigated the syntactic status of null objects in Korean based on two within-subjects experiments, where subjects were asked to judge if a range of sentences, both with and without null objects, accurately represented a specific situation, as described in a longer text, finding evidence for an ellipsis-based analysis. In general, there are advantages and disadvantages to both designs, and the choice should depend primarily on the nature of the hypotheses being investigated (Charness et al 2012).…”
Section: Empirical Approaches To Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%