2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2008.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number of Crossing-Free Geometric Graphs vs. Triangulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also let tr(N ) and pg(N ) denote, respectively, the maximum values of tr(S) and of pg(S), over all sets S of N points in the plane. Since a triangulation of S has fewer than 3|S| edges, the trivial upper bound pg(S) < 8 |S| · tr(S) holds for any point set S. Recently, Razen, Snoeyink, and Welzl [22] slightly improved the upper bound on the ratio pg(S)/tr(S) from 8 |S| down to O 7.9792 |S| . We give a more significant improvement on the ratio with an upper bound of 6.9283 |S| .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also let tr(N ) and pg(N ) denote, respectively, the maximum values of tr(S) and of pg(S), over all sets S of N points in the plane. Since a triangulation of S has fewer than 3|S| edges, the trivial upper bound pg(S) < 8 |S| · tr(S) holds for any point set S. Recently, Razen, Snoeyink, and Welzl [22] slightly improved the upper bound on the ratio pg(S)/tr(S) from 8 |S| down to O 7.9792 |S| . We give a more significant improvement on the ratio with an upper bound of 6.9283 |S| .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, every graph G ∈ P(S) will be counted supp(G) times in the preceding inequality. Recently, Razen, Snoeyink, and Welzl [22] managed to break the 8 N barrier by overcoming the above inefficiency. However, they obtained only a slight improvement, with the bound pg(S) = O 7.9792 N · tr(S).…”
Section: Pg(s) < 8 N · Tr(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of crossing-free structures (matchings, spanning trees, spanning cycles, triangulations) on a set of n points in the plane is known to be exponential in n [11,16,21,24,25,26]. It is a challenging problem to determine the number of configurations faster than listing all such configurations (i.e., count faster than enumerate) [3].…”
Section: Counting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous problems have been previously studied for cycles, spanning cycles, spanning trees, and matchings [6] in n-vertex edge-maximal planar graphs-that are defined in purely graph theoretic terms. For plane straight-line graphs, previous research focused on the maximum number of (noncrossing) configurations such as plane graphs, spanning trees, spanning cycles, triangulations, and others, over all n-element point sets in the plane [1,2,11,16,21,23,24,25,26]; see also the two surveys [12,27]. Early upper bounds in this area were obtained by multiplying the maximum number of triangulations on n point in the plane with the maximum number of desired configurations in an n-vertex triangulation, based on the fact that every planar straight-line graph can be augmented into a triangulation.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first exponential bound, 10 13N , on the number of such graphs was proved by Ajtai et al [4] back in 1982. Since then, progressively (and significantly) smaller upper bounds have been derived (for example, see [14,18,23]). Upper bounds on numbers of more specific types of crossing-free straight-edge graphs, such as Hamiltonian cycles, spanning trees, perfect matchings, and triangulations, were also studied (e.g., see [6,7,20,21,25]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%