2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.85.023607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number-phase Wigner representation for scalable stochastic simulations of controlled quantum systems

Abstract: Simulation of conditional master equations is important to describe systems under continuous measurement and for the design of control strategies in quantum systems. For large bosonic systems, such as Bose-Einstein condensates and atom lasers, full quantum-field simulations must rely on scalable stochastic methods. Currently, these methods have a convergence time that is restricted by the use of representations based on coherent states. Here, we show that typical measurements on atom-optical systems have a com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, it has been motivated by a question raised by the referee of [1]. Namely, the referee pointed out that the Weyl quantization formalism developed in [1] should be closely related to the Wigner function and the Wigner representation of quantum phase investigated previously by the others [2][3][4]. So, here we follow this suggestion and we intend to display, how one can define the Wigner function which depends on the number and the phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, it has been motivated by a question raised by the referee of [1]. Namely, the referee pointed out that the Weyl quantization formalism developed in [1] should be closely related to the Wigner function and the Wigner representation of quantum phase investigated previously by the others [2][3][4]. So, here we follow this suggestion and we intend to display, how one can define the Wigner function which depends on the number and the phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These approximations were all developed and verified in [31,32]. After the application of these approximations, equation (A.12) simplifies to dN [n(·), ϕ(·)] = 1 h dx dyh (x, y, u) − i∂ n(y) (n(x) + δ(0)/2) (n(y) + δ(0)/2)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the quasi-probability distribution in equation (B.5) can have negative values, and thus cannot be efficiently sampled [104]. Instead, we sample from an approximate distribution that is valid when the number of particles N is much larger than the number of simulated modes M. The details of these approximations and a derivation of the resulting approximate distribution can be found in [31,32]; here we simply present the result N α 0 [n(·), ϕ(·)] ≈ x √ 2 n 0 (x) n(x) e −n 0 (x)+ −2((ϕ(x)−ϕ 0 (x)) ψ (1) (n(x)+1) n(x)! πψ (1)…”
Section: Appendix B Initial Conditions For Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, we see that the NΘ-methods are able to capture the phase diffusion on the level of the ensemble, as well as TWA. This relative success of the NΘ-methods with respect to the XP-methods is somewhat reminiscent of a similar observation for number-phase phase-space methods of monitored quantum systems [68,69]. What distinguishes the NΘ-Gaussian method from TWA, however, is that the NΘ-Gaussian method is able to show the composition of the ensemble: it maintains information of individual trajectories, which is lost in TWA (we note that in practice, under appropriate conditions, a single TWA sample may still be representative of experimental realizations [56,70]).…”
Section: Nθ-gaussian Statesmentioning
confidence: 90%