“…2), since for k = 4, we have r = 4 for which v (r ) [4,4] in which lies the square number 4 = i 2 and u (r ) r − j = r 2 − j 2 − j = 10 2 − 9 2 − 9 = 10, v (r ) r − j = r 2 − j 2 + j = 10 2 − 9 2 + 9 = 28, thus giving I On the contrary, (3,9,4) is not an absentee-voxel, as for k = 4, there is no such r for which J (r ) r −4 contains 3 2 ; in fact, for k = 4, we get the interval I To characterize the absentees as a whole, we use Lemma 3 for the expanded form of (the lower and the upper limits of) J (r ) r −k . We replace r by k + h and r + 1 by k + (h + 1), where the h(≥ 0)th run of pixels in C 1 (r ) drawn on zx-plane has z = k [7]. Thus,…”