2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number words are special: Evidence from a case of primary progressive aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to exclude category size as a cause of MMV's selective deficit with numbers. These results are similar to those obtained by other individuals (Thioux et al, 1998;Domahs et al, 2006). Finally, we might consider whether it is number words per se that are affected or any words that refer to quantity-words such as many, few, enough, etc.…”
Section: The Special Status Of Numbers?supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows us to exclude category size as a cause of MMV's selective deficit with numbers. These results are similar to those obtained by other individuals (Thioux et al, 1998;Domahs et al, 2006). Finally, we might consider whether it is number words per se that are affected or any words that refer to quantity-words such as many, few, enough, etc.…”
Section: The Special Status Of Numbers?supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In combination, these results are taken as evidence of post-lexical categorical organization of the representation of the written forms of letters and numbers -categoryspecificity at the periphery of the language processing system. It should also be noted that cases describing selective sparing of number words at multiple levels of representation have also been reported (e.g., see Anderson et al, 1990;Domahs, Bartha, Lochy, Benke &Delazer, 2006 andStarrfelt, 2006). …”
Section: The Cognitive and Neural Categorically Of Numbers And Numbermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Marangolo, Nasti, and Zorzi (2004) assumed that their patient, ZA, with impaired oral production of number words and relatively spared production of words had difficulty in accessing number words in the phonological output lexicon. Domahs, Bartha, Lochy, Benke, and Delazer (2006) described a case of primary progressive aphasia with spared semantic knowledge for numerals and concepts related to nouns and massive impairment in comprehension and naming of words but not of number words. This pattern of results was taken as evidence of damage to an amodal lexical layer between the semantic system and the four modality-specific word stores, with a selective preservation of numerals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, her semantic knowledge was argued to be largely unimpaired for both kinds of words. In the light of their own findings and cases reported in the literature, Domahs et al suggested that number words and other words may be differentially organised at the semantic level of processing and the lexico-semantic connections, both functionally and neuro-anatomically [14].…”
Section: Dissociation Between Number Words and Other Words In Clinicamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition they suggested different modality-specific output lexicons for the written and spoken production of numerals [13]. Highlighting the connections between semantic and lexical knowledge, Domahs et al reported on a patient with primary progressive aphasia (HT) [14]. This patient showed a pronounced dissociation between number words and other words in all four modalities (auditory and visual lexical decision, naming, reading aloud, writing to dictation).…”
Section: Dissociation Between Number Words and Other Words In Clinicamentioning
confidence: 99%