1907
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1907.9.4.02a00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numeral Systems of the Languages of California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would suggest that addition by one—application of the successor function—should provide the most natural base system for counting since it would transparently map between words/morphology and meaning. However, even the way that count series are linguistically formed varies beyond the additive, as some systems exhibit multiplication and even subtraction in their construction (Bowern & Zentz, 2012; Carrier, 1981; Dixon & Kroeber, 1907).…”
Section: Forms Of Number Representation Are Diverse Across Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would suggest that addition by one—application of the successor function—should provide the most natural base system for counting since it would transparently map between words/morphology and meaning. However, even the way that count series are linguistically formed varies beyond the additive, as some systems exhibit multiplication and even subtraction in their construction (Bowern & Zentz, 2012; Carrier, 1981; Dixon & Kroeber, 1907).…”
Section: Forms Of Number Representation Are Diverse Across Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural history of mathematics shows that, large, exact, symbolic number is cognitively difficult for humans to create, the product of a long cross-cultural history (Chrisomalis, 2009b; Damerow, 2015; Ifrah, 2000; Joseph, 1987) and that modern conceptions of number are far from universal across human groups. The picture that emerges instead from the ethnographic literature reveals a diversity of culturally contingent approaches to problems of quantity, which are constructed according to local needs, perceptions, practices, and history (Beller et al, 2018; Crossley, 2007; Dixon & Kroeber, 1907; Hymes, 1955; Owens & Lean, 2018; Robson, 2008; Wolfers, 1971). We consider each of (i)–(vi) in turn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Luiseño of California counted “chiefly by means of the fingers and toes” ( Sparkman, 1905 , 657). This method often creates groupings by fives and twenties: “ten,” “all my-hand finished”; “fifteen,” “all my-hand finished and one my-foot”; “twenty,” “another finished my-foot the-side” ( Dixon and Kroeber, 1907 , 689).…”
Section: Counting On the Hand(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seidenberg claimed the two-cycle system was once widespread, but Lean found that there were few systems that were pure two-cycle systems in PNG, and they have not been found en route to South America (e.g., in North America although a paper on California contradicts this (DIXON & KROEBER, 1907). In PNG, as elsewhere, most two-cycle systems, in fact, went on to have a (2, 5) or (2, 5, 20) cycle system and these existed well before the 10-cycle systems introduced mainly by Austronesian (AN) Oceanic speakers.…”
Section: Countering the Diffusionist Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%