Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2017/606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numeric Planning via Abstraction and Policy Guided Search

Abstract: The real-world application of planning techniques often requires models with numeric fluents. However, these fluents are not directly supported by most planners and heuristics. We describe a family of planning algorithms that takes a numeric planning problem and produces an abstracted representation that can be solved using any classical planner. The resulting abstract plan is generalized into a policy and then used to guide the search in the original numeric domain. We prove that our approach is sound, and ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such example is a line of work concerned with the synthesis of finite-state controllers for conformant and generalized planning (Bonet and Geffner 2015;Bonet et al 2017), where the unfairness is handled by enforcing relevant trajectory constraints. A different example is the use of abstract policies to guide search in domains with numeric state variables (Illanes and McIlraith 2017), where the issues with unfairness are dealt by falling back to traditional search methods whenever the guidance is ineffective. In our work, we directly exploit the fact that we do have a model for how the unfair nondeterminism resolves and implement a termination verification process into the search for a solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One such example is a line of work concerned with the synthesis of finite-state controllers for conformant and generalized planning (Bonet and Geffner 2015;Bonet et al 2017), where the unfairness is handled by enforcing relevant trajectory constraints. A different example is the use of abstract policies to guide search in domains with numeric state variables (Illanes and McIlraith 2017), where the issues with unfairness are dealt by falling back to traditional search methods whenever the guidance is ineffective. In our work, we directly exploit the fact that we do have a model for how the unfair nondeterminism resolves and implement a termination verification process into the search for a solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work realizes this vision by leveraging ideas from a number of different areas of research including generalized planning (e.g., (Levesque 2005;Hu and Levesque 2009;Srivastava, Immerman, and Zilberstein 2008;Hu and Levesque 2010; Hu and De Giacomo 2011)), numeric planning (e.g., (Srivastava et al 2011;Illanes and McIlraith 2017)), and techniques for recognizing indistinguishable objects in planning domains (Riddle et al 2015;2016; Fuentetaja and de la Rosa 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Temporal fast downward, which is the heuristic search planner employing this heuristic, was not able to solve any of the instances of our Sailing problem. Illanes and McIlraith (2017) also use a qualitative abstraction of the numeric aspects of the problem. They construct a classical planning problem by replacing numeric conditions with propositions and use a classical planner to devise a partial policy, which is used to guide the search for a plan in the numeric planning problem.…”
Section: Numeric Planning Via Heuristic Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a random-walk approach was proposed for consumer-only numeric planning problems (Nakhost, Hoffmann, and Müller 2012). A recent work transforms a numeric task into a classical one via abstractions and a plan in the abstract space is used to guide the search in the numeric state space (Illanes and McIlraith 2017). Most of these works are valid for problems beyond simple numeric conditions, as they consider linear or polynomial effects of actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%