2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-020-01148-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical algorithm for the space-time fractional Fokker–Planck system with two internal states

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From [55], we know that the inverse of an invertible lower triangular Toeplitz matrix is also an invertible lower triangular Toeplitz matrix. Thus, we choose the revised version of Bini's algorithm [56] to compute 22 . The computational cost and the storage requirement of (3.5) are O(M N log(M N )) and O(M N ), respectively.…”
Section: The Bilateral Preconditioning Technique and Its Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From [55], we know that the inverse of an invertible lower triangular Toeplitz matrix is also an invertible lower triangular Toeplitz matrix. Thus, we choose the revised version of Bini's algorithm [56] to compute 22 . The computational cost and the storage requirement of (3.5) are O(M N log(M N )) and O(M N ), respectively.…”
Section: The Bilateral Preconditioning Technique and Its Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it is difficult to obtain analytical solutions of fractional partial differential equations (FPDEs). Thus, numerous numerical methods have been proposed to solve them, see [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and the references therein. Yang et al [25] proposed two novel numerical schemes to solve a time-space fractional diffusion equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the convergence rates are O(h k+1 ), higher than the predicted one in Theorem 4.4. 18) with p = 0, respectively, as the exact solution and source term; from [2,19], it is known that the solution u ∈ H s+ 1 2 −ǫ (R 2 ) with ǫ > 0 arbitrary small. Here, we take T = 1, τ = T /20000, ϑ = 5, and k = 1, 2 with flux (9).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various numerical methods, such as finite element, finite difference, and spectral method, are proposed to solve a wide variety of equations involving integral fractional Laplacian. For example, [1][2][3][4]6,19,26] use finite element method with piecewise linear polynomial to solve equations involving fractional Laplacian with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition; [5] discusses the regularity for fractional Poisson equation with nonhomogenous Dirichlet boundary condition and proposes a mixed finite element scheme. [14,15,17] solve the fractional Poisson equation by finite difference method and an O(h 2 ) convergence rate is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractional Fokker-Planck equations have attracted many attentions in recent years and the corresponding numerical schemes are extensively proposed [1,2,6,7,10,11,13,15,16,19]. But these numerical methods are mainly constructed for the fractional Fokker-Planck equation with one diffusion operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%