2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of a water mist spray: The importance of various numerical and physical parameters, including the drag force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since water splashes into the enclosed space outside the barrel and on the glass, an error of 5-8% can be allowed [19]. As seen in Figure 5c,d, hot water is more effective than cold water in the oil pan.…”
Section: Water Flux Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since water splashes into the enclosed space outside the barrel and on the glass, an error of 5-8% can be allowed [19]. As seen in Figure 5c,d, hot water is more effective than cold water in the oil pan.…”
Section: Water Flux Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main findings indicate a strong sensitivity of fire suppression to initial droplet size, where injection of large droplets may cause an increase in overall temperature. Myers and Marshall (2016) and Liu et al (2022) developed an Euler-Lagrangian representation of sprinkler spray using CFD with the results of Ren et al (2011) and Zhou et al (2012). Further, Liu et al (2022) modeled hot air jets using FDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myers and Marshall (2016) and Liu et al (2022) developed an Euler-Lagrangian representation of sprinkler spray using CFD with the results of Ren et al (2011) and Zhou et al (2012). Further, Liu et al (2022) modeled hot air jets using FDS. Sheppard (2002) conducted full-scale experiments on characterizing the suppression parameters of spray like water droplet size, droplet velocity, and water flux using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Phase Doppler Anemometry (PDA) which is also known as Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study is motivated by an apparent lack of in-depth assessment of the drag reduction model in CFD simulations of full water sprays typical for fire suppression applications, to the best of the authors' knowledge. To that purpose, multiple water sprays, with variable level of density (or particle volume fraction, 𝛼) are investigated: the 'Wuhan' spray [16], the 'VTT' spray [17] as described in the FDS validation guide [18] and the 'Fukui' spray [19]. Based on the operating conditions and the spray characteristics, the Wuhan spray is expected to be much denser than the two other sprays and has been the starting point of this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial case for the discussion of the impact of this novel DVF-based drag reduction model on CFD simulations is the Wuhan spray, for which experiments have been carried out in order to characterize the overall shape of a water mist spray and the subsequent water density distribution on the floor [16]. The follow-up comprehensive numerical study carried on in the latter paper has shown that the predicted spray is significantly narrower (by 78%) than the actual spray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%