2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of an osseointegrated prosthesis fixation with reduced bone failure risk and periprosthetic bone loss

Abstract: Currently available implants for direct attachment of prosthesis to the skeletal system after transfemoral amputation (OPRA system, Integrum AB, Sweden and ISP Endo/Exo prosthesis, ESKA Implants AG, Germany) show many advantages over the conventional socket fixation. However, restraining biomechanical issues such as considerable bone loss around the stem and peri-prosthetic bone fractures are present. To overcome these limiting issues a new concept of the direct intramedullary fixation was developed. We hypoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The longevity of the bone‐device bond is also an important issue considering the relatively short hosting bone of the residuum and the high loads associated with operating limb prostheses . An additional concern for longevity of the bone‐device bond is that after replacement surgery, the porosity of the cortical bone hosting the femur implant increases compared to the ipsilateral bone, potentially reducing cortical bone strength …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The longevity of the bone‐device bond is also an important issue considering the relatively short hosting bone of the residuum and the high loads associated with operating limb prostheses . An additional concern for longevity of the bone‐device bond is that after replacement surgery, the porosity of the cortical bone hosting the femur implant increases compared to the ipsilateral bone, potentially reducing cortical bone strength …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,24,87,92 An additional concern for longevity of the bone-device bond is that after replacement surgery, the porosity of the cortical bone hosting the femur implant increases compared to the ipsilateral bone, potentially reducing cortical bone strength. 93,94 To meet the existing challenges faced by DSA, the development of new designs and methodologies for reducing the associated risks 95,96 continues. New challenges may arise with the promising use of the transcutaneous implants for neuromuscular control of the limb prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before reliance on an in silico model can be established its accuracy must be assessed. 1,41,42 Validated FE proximal femur models 12 and SAAP FE models in proximal femurs 39,44 are described in the literature, however at the time of writing, there is no study describing a validated in silico model of an ITAP in a proximal femur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect, called stress shielding, increases the porosity of the cortical bone that hosts the implant, relative to the ipsilateral bone [15]. The outcomes of stress shielding are reduction in hosting bone strength [1617] and cortical thinning in the distal zones, which increases with time [18]. The weaking and thinning increase the risk of failure, especially among young patients who are involved in more active locomotion [1920].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%