1983
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational1966.23.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis of Cooling Characteristics for Water Bar

Abstract: SynopsisThe cooling process of a hot steel plate by a cylindrical water flow was studied experimentally and analytically in this paper.The cooling characteristics were examined on the basis of cooling curves obtained under various experimental conditions. A numerical model was built up to calculate the relation between temperature and time at a given point of the steel plate during cooling. Then, the heat transfer coefficient on the water cooling zone was found out so that the cooling curve calculated by the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
29
2
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another work Akmal et al [2] for horizontal cylindrical steel surface of 7.82 mm thickness at 500 °C initial temperature found the wetting front velocity as 28.9 and 2.5 mm/s respectively at 19 and 26 mm downstream locations with the jet of 3 mm diameter and jet velocity of 5.0 m/s. Moreover, based on experimental results, Hatta et al [32] correlated the wetting radius merely in term of time, without considering any other operating parameter. Therefore, these relations cannot be used for comparing the present experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another work Akmal et al [2] for horizontal cylindrical steel surface of 7.82 mm thickness at 500 °C initial temperature found the wetting front velocity as 28.9 and 2.5 mm/s respectively at 19 and 26 mm downstream locations with the jet of 3 mm diameter and jet velocity of 5.0 m/s. Moreover, based on experimental results, Hatta et al [32] correlated the wetting radius merely in term of time, without considering any other operating parameter. Therefore, these relations cannot be used for comparing the present experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] However, as previously mentioned, because the cooling result is very sensitive to variations of the side factors, very wide-ranging results have been predicted according to experimental conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to describe the phenomenon exclusively for small changes in operating and design parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[2][3][4][5] As discussed in previous work, 1) since the process is closely connected with the thermal-fluidic behavior of the residual water accompanying with the impinging jet motion, the plate running motion, the heat transfer between the hot steel plate and the cooling water, and the complex effect of these factors, the perfect similarity between the laboratory scale and the real scale cannot be achieved. Hence a lot of researchers have conducted real scale experiments [6][7][8][9] not to be retained on a laboratory scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%