2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2013.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of flow over side weir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) also showed very good agreement, as the average difference does not exceed 2.8 %. The best agreement of our measurements with the equations from other authors was found by the comparison with the study from [4], in which the side walls in the side channel were also considered, as was done in our case. Furthermore, the measured values are in good agreement with the calculated values according to the equation in [13], where the average difference does not exceed 3.7 % and the maximum difference 8 %.…”
Section: Verification Using Other Experimental Data For Sharp-crestedsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(6) also showed very good agreement, as the average difference does not exceed 2.8 %. The best agreement of our measurements with the equations from other authors was found by the comparison with the study from [4], in which the side walls in the side channel were also considered, as was done in our case. Furthermore, the measured values are in good agreement with the calculated values according to the equation in [13], where the average difference does not exceed 3.7 % and the maximum difference 8 %.…”
Section: Verification Using Other Experimental Data For Sharp-crestedsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several equations have been proposed for the calculation of the coefficient C d for the sharp-crested side weir and for the broad-crested weir. Most of the authors have considered the impact of the inflow Froude number in their equation [2] and [3], some have also considered the impact of the overflow height [4] and [5], but only a few have taken into account the impact of the length of the side weir. The impact of the width of a broadcrested side weir has also been investigated [6] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali et al (2018) Borghei et al (2003) Singh et al(1994) − 89.1471 − 85.9892 0.149129 0.171664 0.065501 0.19969 Jalili and Borghei (1996) − 63.6206 − 60.4627 0.248475 0.318192 0.147583 0.332717 Borghei et al (1999) − 63.9808 − 60.8228 0.237019 0.310161 0.816017 0.317376 Ali et al (2018) − 60.5438 − 61.7628 0.256712 0.356521 0.713012 0.319743 Borghei et al(2003) − 69.9232 − 69.8343 0.275439 0.363231 0.816562 0.335476 -5% +5% Table 4 represent statistics comparison for the present work with previous studies, and it may be seen that the GEP model refers to highest value of R 2 (0.994) and the lowest value of MARE and RMSE (0.00523 and 0.00465), respectively, as well as the AIC refers to the best value (− 216.51) compared with all others equations, and all that indicate that the execution of GEP is the best with respect to other previous equations; overall, all values refer to a good agreement of equation for the present work compared with MLR according to Ahmed (2015) and all other previous equations. Figure 5 shows a comparison between the discharge coefficients estimated using MLR models and GEP models, respectively, while Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…examined using (Statistical Package Social Sciences SPSS user guide). According to Ahmed (2015), from Eq. 7 using several models of SPSS, Eq.…”
Section: Modeling Of Skew Side Weir Using Mlrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation