2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of heat transfer characteristics of spray flames impinging on a wall under CI engine-like conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The injection pressure effect, represented by comparing Figure 13(b) to Figure 13(c), is more subtle, but shows smaller impingement zones in the bowl and slightly higher heat flux in the squish for the 110 MPa case. Based on measurements in the literature for spray penetration 27,28 and the influence of injection velocity on wall heat flux, 13,14,29 it is hypothesized that the fuel jets at 110 MPa injection pressure have relatively lower momentum at the point of impact where the flow impinges on the piston surfaces, which generates less intense turbulence in the boundary layer. Even though lower injection pressure resulted in an extended duration combustion event, the CFD and piston temperature results suggest that the net effect is relatively less piston heat transfer.…”
Section: Conjugate Heat Transfer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injection pressure effect, represented by comparing Figure 13(b) to Figure 13(c), is more subtle, but shows smaller impingement zones in the bowl and slightly higher heat flux in the squish for the 110 MPa case. Based on measurements in the literature for spray penetration 27,28 and the influence of injection velocity on wall heat flux, 13,14,29 it is hypothesized that the fuel jets at 110 MPa injection pressure have relatively lower momentum at the point of impact where the flow impinges on the piston surfaces, which generates less intense turbulence in the boundary layer. Even though lower injection pressure resulted in an extended duration combustion event, the CFD and piston temperature results suggest that the net effect is relatively less piston heat transfer.…”
Section: Conjugate Heat Transfer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such second order derivatives would signify the rate of change of the heat transfer rate to the solid wall and would assist in the qualitative identification of the flame-wall interaction events. During spray flame impingement on the wall, the total wall heat flux reaches the largest, 18 hence second order derivative of wall heat flux as a function of crank angle, would provide the instances of the such spray flame impingement. The injection profiles used in the simulations were obtained from injection rate measurements and are illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Evaluation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some studies have clarified the flow near the wall and heat flux using numerical calculations. Phillai et al 13 conducted a numerical study on the effect of the fuel injection velocity on the wall heat flux. The research showed that the wall heat flux was largest near the stagnation point and decreased with increasing radial distance from the stagnation point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%