2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis of Seasonal Heat Storage Systems of Alternative Geothermal Energy Pile Foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical methods are common in ground heat exchanger research (e.g Fan et al, 2008, Zanchini et al, 2012 and allow consideration of many more configurations that can be addressed in practical experiments. However, most models are produced to consider specific case studies (e.g Knellwolf et al, 2011, Dupray et al, 2014, Sinnathamby, 2014 and do not take the opportunity to study the important general problem of optimisation guidance for designers. Distinct from previous work this study allows the relative importance of the design key parameters to be compared so that practical recommendations can be made regarding where designers should focus their efforts to increase the energy efficiency of their energy piles scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods are common in ground heat exchanger research (e.g Fan et al, 2008, Zanchini et al, 2012 and allow consideration of many more configurations that can be addressed in practical experiments. However, most models are produced to consider specific case studies (e.g Knellwolf et al, 2011, Dupray et al, 2014, Sinnathamby, 2014 and do not take the opportunity to study the important general problem of optimisation guidance for designers. Distinct from previous work this study allows the relative importance of the design key parameters to be compared so that practical recommendations can be made regarding where designers should focus their efforts to increase the energy efficiency of their energy piles scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, two-dimensional analyses were performed in order to reproduce all the cases outlined in Table 1. In each of these simulations, the extraction rate 2 [ / 2 ] applied to the plane sources was the one commonly employed in the literature, which guarantees that the same energy per metre is exchanged with the ground (Dupray et al 2014;Sinnathamby et al, 2015):…”
Section: Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pothiraksanon et al, 2010). The frequently employed practice of simply dividing the heat extraction rate of the individual vertical heat exchanger ( ) by their out-of-plane spacing ( ) (Dupray et al 2014;Sinnathamby et al, 2015) is shown to lead to inaccurate estimates of temperature changes in the ground. Indeed, analyses presented herein demonstrate that this approach tends to overestimate the temperature field around a group of VHEs, especially with a low number of heat exchangers and a small spacing (less then 10m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While more recent studies focused on the environmental impact of SUHIs (e.g Müller et al [6], Bonte et al [14], Brielmann et al [15]), others have studied their associated geothermal potential (e.g., Allen et al [16], Arola and Korkka-Niemi [17], Sinnathamby et al [18]). Zhu et al [19], Zhang et al [20] for instance evaluated this potential in several cities including London, Prague, Cologne, Winnipeg and Beijing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%