2008
DOI: 10.2216/07-17.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of small Arctic diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) representing the Staurosira and Staurosirella species complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The large diversity of Staurosiralike diatoms was already reported by Stoof- Leichsenring et al (2014Leichsenring et al ( , 2015 with respect to changes in haplotype appearances across tundra-northern taiga transects, and is corroborated by the results of our study. The taxonomy of Staurosira-like diatom taxa, as revealed by morphological analyses is still in revision (Williams and Round 1987;Paull et al 2008;Stoof-Leichsenring et al 2014). For example, one confusing reference description is S. elliptica (accession number HQ828193) and its likely synonym S. pinnata, used in morphological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large diversity of Staurosiralike diatoms was already reported by Stoof- Leichsenring et al (2014Leichsenring et al ( , 2015 with respect to changes in haplotype appearances across tundra-northern taiga transects, and is corroborated by the results of our study. The taxonomy of Staurosira-like diatom taxa, as revealed by morphological analyses is still in revision (Williams and Round 1987;Paull et al 2008;Stoof-Leichsenring et al 2014). For example, one confusing reference description is S. elliptica (accession number HQ828193) and its likely synonym S. pinnata, used in morphological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relatively new tool constitutes a promising approach for detecting minute fragilarioid diatoms that are difficult to identify in microscopic investigations. The advantage of genetic applications is that we can achieve finer taxonomic resolution (below species level), which can be important in identifying species that are morphologically hard to distinguish or morphologically very variable and for which the taxonomy is uncertain (Paull et al 2008). Paull et al (2008) pointed to the morphological similarity between the small Arctic fragilarioid taxa S. venter and S. pinnata and claimed this similarity may have caused identification problems and led to false interpretations.…”
Section: Usability Of Sedimentary Dna For Diatom Identification In Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable reconstruction of environmental variables can only be achieved if the diatom species are correctly identified. Paull et al (2008) illustrated the difficulties encountered in the identification of small fragilarioid forms: distinguishing between Pseudostaurosira elliptica (Schumann) Edlund et al (synonym: Fragilaria elliptica Schumann), Staurosira venter (Ehrenberg) Cleve and Möller, and Staurosirella pinnata (Ehrenberg) Williams and Round can be problematic, as these species have very similar, small, elliptic forms in cold waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morales & Manoylov, which are large, elliptic and rarely oval, with rounded extremities. Paull et al (2008) concluded that it is very difficult to distinguish Staurosira venter (Ehrenberg) Cleve & Müller from S. pinnata and that reliable characters are the width of the valve (mean: S. venter: 4.7 μm, S. pinnata: 3.7 μm) and the length of the areolae of the margin (mean: S. venter: 0.2 μm, S. pinnata: 0.5 μm), which can be visualized with a high-quality optical microscope.…”
Section: Staurosirella Pinnatamentioning
confidence: 99%