2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of the influence of pore microstructure on thermal conductivity and Young's modulus of thermal barrier coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the stiffened mechanism due to the infiltration of CMAS, the effective Young's modulus of the topcoat significantly increased from 40 to 175 GPa (noninfiltration to infiltration), as listed in Table 1. Notably, the effective Young's modulus of the CMAS-rich layer is similar to the value evaluated via object-oriented finite elements [31]. Jackson et al [27] also indicated that the effective modulus of the CMAS-rich layer increases to 180 GPa when the silicates crystallize and stiffen.…”
Section: Materials Propertiessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Given the stiffened mechanism due to the infiltration of CMAS, the effective Young's modulus of the topcoat significantly increased from 40 to 175 GPa (noninfiltration to infiltration), as listed in Table 1. Notably, the effective Young's modulus of the CMAS-rich layer is similar to the value evaluated via object-oriented finite elements [31]. Jackson et al [27] also indicated that the effective modulus of the CMAS-rich layer increases to 180 GPa when the silicates crystallize and stiffen.…”
Section: Materials Propertiessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The results predict that the bridge area is the microstructural parameter with the greatest impact on the conductivity. Several factors play significant roles in determining the thermal conductivity, such as pore size, pore distribution, and crack orientation [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. Wei et al [82] developed an analytical model to discuss the effects of the microstructural parameters, including splat thickness, bonding ratio between splits, and unit size, on the total thermal resistance and to reveal the dominant effect of oriented 2D pores on heat flux (Figure 11) [72,82,83].…”
Section: Materials and Structure Of Top Coatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the service temperature, the radiation heat transfer caused by the pores cannot be ignored [84][85][86][87][88]. Numerous studies have shown that pores parallel to the direction of the substrate can drastically reduce the thermal conductivity [41,62,67,73,[89][90][91]. Boissonnet et al [92] prepared a series of TBCs with different thicknesses by PS and high-velocity oxygen-fuel spraying (Figure 12).…”
Section: Materials and Structure Of Top Coatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments, analytical, and numerical analyses are the primary approaches to evaluate the properties of rock mass, 5–7 which provide valuable information for various engineering projects. In experimental methods, rock hydraulic, and thermal properties are usually measured by Darcy's experiments, 8 in‐situ permeability measurement, 9 heat flow meter‐based methods, 10 simple hot box‐heat flow meter‐based methods 11 and in‐situ measurement without heat flow meter methods 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%