2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of vorticity transport and energy dissipation of inner-blade vortex in Francis turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Figure 4, the hydraulic loss derived from the pressure-drop method is closer to the entropy production calculation results, with a maximum coefficient of error of 1.75% in Case 1, and with the flow rate increase the error is relatively reduced, with a minimum coefficient of variance of 0.73% in Case 3. The total calculation distributions of both show similarity, but because the entropy production method can quantitatively obtain the specific distribution of hydraulic losses and can estimate the energy loss caused by different hydraulic loss phenomena such as internal flow vortex [26,27], inverse gradient flow, and backflow, it has become an important means of evaluating the hydraulic efficiency of hydraulic machines at present [28,29]. Figure 5 shows the total internal hydraulic loss of the turbine under different operating conditions and the distribution of head loss at each structure.…”
Section: Total Hydraulic Loss Distribution Of the Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen from Figure 4, the hydraulic loss derived from the pressure-drop method is closer to the entropy production calculation results, with a maximum coefficient of error of 1.75% in Case 1, and with the flow rate increase the error is relatively reduced, with a minimum coefficient of variance of 0.73% in Case 3. The total calculation distributions of both show similarity, but because the entropy production method can quantitatively obtain the specific distribution of hydraulic losses and can estimate the energy loss caused by different hydraulic loss phenomena such as internal flow vortex [26,27], inverse gradient flow, and backflow, it has become an important means of evaluating the hydraulic efficiency of hydraulic machines at present [28,29]. Figure 5 shows the total internal hydraulic loss of the turbine under different operating conditions and the distribution of head loss at each structure.…”
Section: Total Hydraulic Loss Distribution Of the Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of vortex incipient, growth, and shedding to complete dissipation induces various instability problems in the operation of turbomachinery, such as turbulent motion noise [5], rotational stall [6], and cavitation [7], which will eventually affect the regular operation of the system. Therefore, the accurate identification of vortex structures in fluid machinery is of great significance to mastering various unsteady flow structures and optimizing the flow process in turbomachinery [8]. In intuitive understanding, vortices are commonly associated with the rotational motion of fluids, but it is important to note that there is still much controversy in academia over the specific definition of vortices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reza et al studied the pressure fluctuation of large hydropower stations with Francis turbine units and found that the pressure fluctuation is significant at lower power levels, and many pressure waves caused by turbulence in the running unit waterway have a great impact on adjacent units [3]. Tang et al studied the Francis turbine inner vortex characteristics by using numerical methods [4]. Su et al studied the pressure pulsation characteristics of a Francis turbine under local flow conditions and concluded that chaotic attractors do exist in the turbine pressure fluctuation signal [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%