Kindergarten to 3 rd grade mathematics achievement scores from a prospective study of mathematical development were subjected to latent growth trajectory analyses (n = 306). The four corresponding classes included children with mathematical learning disability (MLD, 6% of sample), and low (LA, 50%), typically (TA, 39%) and high (HA, 5%) achieving children. The groups were administered a battery of intelligence (IQ), working memory, and mathematical-cognition measures in 1 st grade. The children with MLD had general deficits in working memory and IQ, and potentially more specific deficits on measures of number sense. The LA children did not have working memory or IQ deficits, but showed moderate deficits on these number sense measures and for addition fact retrieval. The distinguishing features of the HA children were a strong visuospatial working memory, a strong number sense, and frequent use of memory-based processes to solve addition problems. Implications for the early identification of children at risk for poor mathematics achievement are discussed.About 7% of children and adolescents will experience a substantive learning deficit in at least one area of mathematics (MLD) before graduating from high school (Barbaresi, Katusic, Colligan, Weaver, & Jacobsen 2005;Lewis, Hitch, & Walker, 1994;Ostad, 1998;Shalev, Manor, & Gross-Tsur, 2005), and are accompanied by another 5% to 10% of children and adolescents, and perhaps more, with learning difficulties (for reviews see Dowker, 2005). The latter students have specific difficulties in one more areas of mathematics that are independent of cognitive ability and reading achievement, and in this sense might be considered to have a moderate learning disability in mathematics. It is not known if the factors underlying their difficulties are simply less pervasive or severe as those that appear to underlie MLD or are qualitatively different (e.g., due to poor instruction; Geary, Hoard, Byrd-Craven, Nugent, & Numtee, 2007;Murphy, Mazzocco, Hanich, & Early, 2007). Thus, we distinguished the two groups and classified the children with moderate difficulties as low achieving (LA), to be consistent with recent studies (e.g., Murphy et al., 2007). Other unresolved issues concern the extent of the grade-to-grade stability of a child's classification as MLD or LA (Silver, Pennett, Black, Fair, & Balise, 1999) and identification of the early risk factors for long-term inclusion in one or the other of these groups (Gersten, Jordan, & Flojo, 2005).We addressed each of these issues using data from a longitudinal, prospective study of children's mathematical learning and learning disability (Geary, in press). Using latent growth David C. Geary, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-2500, Phone: 573-882-6268, Fax: 573-882-7710, GearyD@Missouri.edu. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscr...