2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigation into passive hydrogen recovery scheme using vacuum ejector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nikiforow K [6] designed a hydrogen ejector for the hydrogen cycle system of 5 kW power PEMFC, and test the hydrogen ejector by test platform, and verified the emission performance of the hydrogen ejector under different pressure drop of the induction loop, different inlet pressure and different hydrogen humidity. Hwang J [7] established a three-dimensional CFD model of ejector and carried out numerical simulation, and tested the performance of ejector on the test bench, and the experimental results show that the model accuracy of hydrogen ejector is high. Song Y [8] made the actual hydrogen ejector, and verified the accuracy of the model with the help of the test bench, and the relative error of the test data to the simulation data was within 7%, indicating that the CFD model had high accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikiforow K [6] designed a hydrogen ejector for the hydrogen cycle system of 5 kW power PEMFC, and test the hydrogen ejector by test platform, and verified the emission performance of the hydrogen ejector under different pressure drop of the induction loop, different inlet pressure and different hydrogen humidity. Hwang J [7] established a three-dimensional CFD model of ejector and carried out numerical simulation, and tested the performance of ejector on the test bench, and the experimental results show that the model accuracy of hydrogen ejector is high. Song Y [8] made the actual hydrogen ejector, and verified the accuracy of the model with the help of the test bench, and the relative error of the test data to the simulation data was within 7%, indicating that the CFD model had high accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, these researches concentrate on the structural parameter optimization and internal flow field analysis of ejectors. For example, Hwang et al [26] used a numerical simulation to study the influence of the inlet mass flow rate and nozzle throat diameter on the pressure, Mach number, temperature, suction channel mass flow, outlet channel mass flow and suction channel entrainment ratio. Nikiforow et al [27] designed an ejector for a 5-kW static PEMFC system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%