2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigation of the spray quenching process with an Euler-Eulerian multi-fluid model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This brings to conclusion that implemented droplet/wall heat transfer model is maybe able to reproduce heat transfer of single droplet, but is unable to cope with effects of pronounced wall wetting, even in the case of fairly dilute spray produced by air assisted atomizer. Also, current model is not able to reproduce change from transition boiling regime to nucleate boiling regime, which is Although correlation of Wendelstorf et al [29] has been already implemented in the work of Edelbauer et al [28], this has been realized in the framework of Eulerian multiphase approach. Present work includes adjustment of correlation for the purposes of Lagrangian spray approach which is still prevailing in industrial applications.…”
Section: Quenching Simulationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This brings to conclusion that implemented droplet/wall heat transfer model is maybe able to reproduce heat transfer of single droplet, but is unable to cope with effects of pronounced wall wetting, even in the case of fairly dilute spray produced by air assisted atomizer. Also, current model is not able to reproduce change from transition boiling regime to nucleate boiling regime, which is Although correlation of Wendelstorf et al [29] has been already implemented in the work of Edelbauer et al [28], this has been realized in the framework of Eulerian multiphase approach. Present work includes adjustment of correlation for the purposes of Lagrangian spray approach which is still prevailing in industrial applications.…”
Section: Quenching Simulationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The CFD is today being employed for numerical modelling of various physical processes with pronounced practical significance, for example: heat transfer of a turbulent jet impinging on a moving plate [22], numerical investigation of film cooling [23], use of autoignition tabulation for complex chemistry combustion mechanisms [24], design of top combustion hot blast stove [25], influence of biofuel addition to diesel fuel [26] and numerical analysis of cement calciner [27]. Regarding spray cooling, one of rare numeric studies was presented in [28] where authors implemented correlation of Wendelstorf et al [29] for heat transfer coefficient as a part of enhanced Euler-Eulerian model for the simulation of spray quenching process. It provided solid basis for numerical implementation because it encompasses wide range of experimental conditions and is only depended upon two parameters, namely impingement density and temperature difference between wall and spray droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 (a). Cooling for 6 s after heating was simulated with reference to the heat transfer coefficient of water spray by Edelbauer et al [16]. The maximum temperature was 201 ℃ (Fig.…”
Section: Simulations Of the High-frequency Induction Hardening Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] This model has been successfully applied in numerical models for quenching applications. [32,33] In the model of Yao and Cox, [30] the heat transfer efficiency for water spray was expressed as the ratio of the heat transfer rate to the theoretically maximal heat transfer rate…”
Section: Materials Properties and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 31 ] This model has been successfully applied in numerical models for quenching applications. [ 32,33 ] In the model of Yao and Cox, [ 30 ] the heat transfer efficiency for water spray was expressed as the ratio of the heat transfer rate to the theoretically maximal heat transfer rateq=ϵ[G(Δhlg+cp,l(TsatTnormall)+cp,v(T0Tsat))]ϵ=8×107(WesTsatnormalΔT)0.62+3.5×103(WesTsatnormalΔT)0.2where Δhlg is the latent heat of vaporization, cp,l is the specific heat capacity of water, Tsat is the saturation temperature of water (boiling point), cp,v is the specific heat capacity of water vapor, and Wenormals is the modified Weber number, which is defined as followsWenormals=G2dρnormallσnormallwhere d is the water droplet diameter and σ 1 is the surface tension of water. The model of Yao and Cox [ 30 ] (Equation (9)) is valid for T surf = 300–800 °C and G = 0–50.5 kg m −2 s −1 .…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%