2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigation of breaking wave forces on a monopile-type offshore wind turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional experimental setup related to breaking waves suggests using a slope whose width is same as that of the flume [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], which is unachievable when the currents are introduced. The width of the slope has to be smaller than that of the flume in this study, in order to not only allow the current to pass by easily, but also generate the breaking waves.…”
Section: Laboratory Experiments 21 Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conventional experimental setup related to breaking waves suggests using a slope whose width is same as that of the flume [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], which is unachievable when the currents are introduced. The width of the slope has to be smaller than that of the flume in this study, in order to not only allow the current to pass by easily, but also generate the breaking waves.…”
Section: Laboratory Experiments 21 Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, two wave gauges (WG, model number: YWH200-D) were used to measure the wave heights with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz, while the surface velocities were measured by acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV, model number: Vectrino Plus) with the same frequency. The conventional experimental setup related to breaking waves suggests using a slope whose width is same as that of the flume [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], which is unachievable when the currents are introduced. The width of the slope has to be smaller than that of the flume in this study, in order to not only allow the current to pass by easily, but also generate the breaking waves.…”
Section: Laboratory Experiments 21 Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a critical issue for the reliable design of the offshore wind turbine foundations. In the literature, several studies are available that utilize CFD simulations to examine the monopile-type foundation in breaking waves, [23][24][25] analyze the slamming effects, 26,27 investigate the flow and scour around the monopile 28,29 and identify the second-order hydrodynamic loads. 30,31 The high-fidelity simulations provide an accurate solution yet demand expensive computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind energy availability in the ocean at water depths larger than 50 m has the advantages of consistent higher energy density, where the floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) is considered as a more cost-effective alternative compared to the fixed-bottom wind turbines such as monopiles or jacket type designs. As of 2019, a total of 65.7 MW floating wind has been installed worldwide (GWEC, 2020;Zeng et al, 2021), including the WindFloat Atlantic, a 25-MW floating offshore wind farm installed 20 km offshore Viana do Castelo, Portugal (EDP, 2021); a 2- MW Ideol Damping Pool FOWT of Floatgen project at France (Ideol, 2021); the Hywind Scotland 30-MW windfarm installed 25 km away from the coastline of Peterhead (Equinor, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%